1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |OFAC Limits Cuba “U-Turn” Payments and Remittances

OFAC Limits Cuba “U-Turn” Payments and Remittances

Client Alert | 1 min read | 09.13.19

On September 9, 2019, the U.S. Department of Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) published amendments to the Cuban Assets Control Regulations (the Cuba Sanctions) to limit “U-turn” transactions and remittances.

“U-turn” transaction is a reference to a Cuba Sanctions authorization (31 CFR § 515.584(d)) for banking institutions subject to U.S. jurisdiction to process transactions prohibited by the Cuba Sanctions if the transaction originated and terminated outside the United States, and the originator and the beneficiary of the funds transfer are not persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction. This “U-turn” authorization had the net effect of enabling non-U.S. persons to conduct U.S. dollar denominated transactions with Cuban persons or involving a benefit in Cuba, even though those transactions were processed or cleared through a U.S. financial institution (USFI).  Now, pursuant to the amended Cuba Sanctions, USFIs will be required to reject and report such transactions to OFAC. These Cuba Sanctions changes will take effect on October 9, 2019.

Practical Points for Consideration

As a reminder, on June 21, 2019 OFAC expanded its reporting requirements (31 CFR § 501.604(a)) to now require any “U.S. person (or person subject to U.S. jurisdiction)” to file an OFAC reject report within 10 business days of rejecting any transaction that would be prohibited by U.S. sanctions.  OFAC has not provided new industries now captured by the rejecting reporting requirements with guidance on the type of activity OFAC is expecting such industries to report as rejected.

If you have any questions on how to interpret your company’s potential new reject requirements under the revised Cuba Sanctions, the attorneys below would be happy to assist.

For additional information on other Cuba Sanctions changes effective October 9, 2019, including remittances, OFAC updated its Frequently Asked Questions Related to Cuba which may be found here: https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/sanctions/Programs/Documents/cuba_faqs_new.pdf

Contacts

Insights

Client Alert | 5 min read | 12.12.25

Eleventh Circuit Hears Argument on False Claims Act Qui Tam Constitutionality

On the morning of December 12, 2025, the Eleventh Circuit heard argument in United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, LLC, et al., No. 24-13581 (11th Cir. 2025). This case concerns the constitutionality of the False Claims Act (FCA) qui tam provisions and a groundbreaking September 2024 opinion in which the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida held that the FCA’s qui tam provisions were unconstitutional under Article II. See United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Fla. Med. Assocs., LLC, 751 F. Supp. 3d 1293 (M.D. Fla. 2024). That decision, penned by District Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle, was the first success story for a legal theory that has been gaining steam ever since Justices Thomas, Barrett, and Kavanaugh indicated they would be willing to consider arguments about the constitutionality of the qui tam provisions in U.S. ex rel. Polansky v. Exec. Health Res., 599 U.S. 419 (2023). In her opinion, Judge Mizelle held (1) qui tam relators are officers of the U.S. who must be appointed under the Appointments Clause; and (2) historical practice treating qui tam and similar relators as less than “officers” for constitutional purposes was not enough to save the qui tam provisions from the fundamental Article II infirmity the court identified. That ruling was appealed and, after full briefing, including by the government and a bevy of amici, the litigants stepped up to the plate this morning for oral argument....

View All Insights