OFAC Limits Cuba “U-Turn” Payments and Remittances
Client Alert | 1 min read | 09.13.19
On September 9, 2019, the U.S. Department of Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) published amendments to the Cuban Assets Control Regulations (the Cuba Sanctions) to limit “U-turn” transactions and remittances.
“U-turn” transaction is a reference to a Cuba Sanctions authorization (31 CFR § 515.584(d)) for banking institutions subject to U.S. jurisdiction to process transactions prohibited by the Cuba Sanctions if the transaction originated and terminated outside the United States, and the originator and the beneficiary of the funds transfer are not persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction. This “U-turn” authorization had the net effect of enabling non-U.S. persons to conduct U.S. dollar denominated transactions with Cuban persons or involving a benefit in Cuba, even though those transactions were processed or cleared through a U.S. financial institution (USFI). Now, pursuant to the amended Cuba Sanctions, USFIs will be required to reject and report such transactions to OFAC. These Cuba Sanctions changes will take effect on October 9, 2019.
Practical Points for Consideration
As a reminder, on June 21, 2019 OFAC expanded its reporting requirements (31 CFR § 501.604(a)) to now require any “U.S. person (or person subject to U.S. jurisdiction)” to file an OFAC reject report within 10 business days of rejecting any transaction that would be prohibited by U.S. sanctions. OFAC has not provided new industries now captured by the rejecting reporting requirements with guidance on the type of activity OFAC is expecting such industries to report as rejected.
If you have any questions on how to interpret your company’s potential new reject requirements under the revised Cuba Sanctions, the attorneys below would be happy to assist.
For additional information on other Cuba Sanctions changes effective October 9, 2019, including remittances, OFAC updated its Frequently Asked Questions Related to Cuba which may be found here: https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/sanctions/Programs/Documents/cuba_faqs_new.pdf
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 4 min read | 08.25.26
DOJ Signals Increased Antitrust Scrutiny of Algorithmic Pricing in Willow Bridge Decision
Algorithmic pricing tools commonly used by businesses to increase efficiency and profits are under increasing antitrust scrutiny. This summer, federal regulators, state attorneys general, and state legislatures grappled with competing businesses providing nonpublic, competitively sensitive data to common algorithmic platforms. The Third Circuit deepened an emerging circuit split with the Ninth Circuit on algorithmic pricing liability, reviving antitrust claims against Atlantic City casino-hotels in a decision with direct implications for any company that uses a common pricing platform. See Crowell’s recent client alert. And New Jersey enacted two landmark laws—the FAIR Act and the Fair Price Protection Act—directly regulating algorithmic rent-setting and surveillance pricing. See Crowell’s recent client alert.
Client Alert | 4 min read | 08.25.26
Recent Court Decision Highlights Effectiveness of “Second Bite” Protests
Client Alert | 5 min read | 08.21.26
FTC Proposes Enforcement Policy Statement on Personalized Pricing: What Businesses Need to Know


