1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |OFAC Continues Iran Insurance Penalty Focus

OFAC Continues Iran Insurance Penalty Focus

Client Alert | 1 min read | 04.29.11

OFAC yesterday announced a $38,444 payment in settlement of charges that HCC Insurance Holdings violated the Iranian Transactions Regulations when it "participated in the hull portion of an aircraft hull and liability insurance placement by a foreign insurance broker that insured a foreign-owned commercial airline that leased aircraft to an air charter company that operated in Iran." 

This announcement is significant for several reasons. First, OFAC provided enough information in the press release to explain why this conduct was a violation, citing the fact that HCC knew or had reason to know that some of the insured aircraft would be operated in Iran and that the underwriting of this business "was harmful to the objectives of the Iranian sanctions program."   Second, it illustrates how OFAC expects insurance companies to comply with the sanctions regulations. Specifically, it demonstrates OFAC's expectations that those subject to US jurisdiction screen all transactions and refrain from participation in coverage that involves Iran (in this case OFAC observed that the insurance policy  "would" not "could" cover aircraft flown into Iran, suggesting that there was no room for HCC to argue otherwise).  Third, it illustrates the benefits of voluntary disclosure; the base penalty amount was $59,960, meaning that the actual penalty was nearly half of the permissible base penalty.  Finally, it illustrates OFAC's ongoing and increasing focus on the insurance/reinsurance industry.  OFAC representatives have indicated more cases involving insurance and reinsurance issues are in the pipeline.

Insights

Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.21.25

A Sign of What’s to Come? Court Dismisses FCA Retaliation Complaint Based on Alleged Discriminatory Use of Federal Funding

On November 7, 2025, in Thornton v. National Academy of Sciences, No. 25-cv-2155, 2025 WL 3123732 (D.D.C. Nov. 7, 2025), the District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed a False Claims Act (FCA) retaliation complaint on the basis that the plaintiff’s allegations that he was fired after blowing the whistle on purported illegally discriminatory use of federal funding was not sufficient to support his FCA claim. This case appears to be one of the first filed, and subsequently dismissed, following Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche’s announcement of the creation of the Civil Rights Fraud Initiative on May 19, 2025, which “strongly encourages” private individuals to file lawsuits under the FCA relating to purportedly discriminatory and illegal use of federal funding for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in violation of Executive Order 14173, Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity (Jan. 21, 2025). In this case, the court dismissed the FCA retaliation claim and rejected the argument that an organization could violate the FCA merely by “engaging in discriminatory conduct while conducting a federally funded study.” The analysis in Thornton could be a sign of how forthcoming arguments of retaliation based on reporting allegedly fraudulent DEI activity will be analyzed in the future....