NLRB Issues Final Rule On "Quickie" Elections
Client Alert | 2 min read | 12.22.11
The National Labor Relations Board ("Board") has just issued, and published in the Federal Register, its "Final Rule" substantially reducing the time frame for the holding of union representation elections after the filing of the petition for election. The Final Rule is to become effective April 30, 2012.
The changes contained in the Final Rule are identical to the changes described in the “Resolution” adopted by the Board on November 30, which are set forth in our Alert of December 6. As we informed in the Alert, under the Final Rule, union representation elections will, except in the rarest of circumstances, be required no later than twenty-five days after the filing of the petition, and could be as soon as fifteen days after the filing.
Issuance of the Final Rule at this time was expected, as enactment required approval of a majority of the Board (two of the three members) prior to the end of the year when Member Craig Becker’s interim appointment expires and the Board loses the three-member quorum necessary for it to act.
Republican Board Member Brian Hayes, who has strongly opposed any election rule changes, did not vote on the Final Rule. He has until the implementation date of April 30, 2012 to issue his dissent.
On December 20, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the Coalition for a Democratic Workplace filed an action in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia contesting the constitutionality of the Final Rule and seeking to enjoin its implementation. The lawsuit asserts that the Final Rule violates the National Labor Relations Act, exceeds the Board’s statutory authority, and is contrary to the First and Fifth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, which guarantee the rights to free speech and due process.
Also, Senator Mike Enzi (R-Wyo), the ranking member of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, vowed that he will use the Congressional Review Act to challenge the Final Rule, characterizing it as the “Ambush Election Rule” and a “gift to union bosses.” In this same regard, Congressman John Kline (R-Minn.), Chairman of the House Education and the Workforce Committee, has sponsored legislation – the Workforce Democracy and Fairness Act – to overturn the Final Rule. He, too, characterized the Final Rule as the "Ambush Election Rule," designed “to advance an activist pro-union agenda at any cost."
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 06.03.26
Important EU Court Judgment Clarifies Rules on Interest Due in Cartel Damages Cases
In a judgment that will have direct and immediate consequences, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has clarified that for all competition damages actions brought after 26 December 2014, interest runs from the date on which the harm occurred. The ruling addressed two important questions: (1) whether national provisions implementing Article 3(2) of the EU Damages Directive — which requires interest to run from the date harm occurred —apply to cases in which the harm preceded the adoption of those provisions; and (2) how the date of harm should be determined in cartel cases involving the purchase of goods at inflated prices.
Client Alert | 2 min read | 06.02.26
SBA OHA Confirms That the Submission Date for a Proposal with Pricing Controls Size Determination
Client Alert | 5 min read | 06.01.26
California Court Upholds Insurer’s Duty to Defend After Covered Claim Is Dismissed
Client Alert | 2 min read | 05.29.26
California Assembly Passes AB 1776, Sending Major Antitrust Bill to the Senate



