1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |NHTSA Proposes Increases in Maximum Civil Penalties

NHTSA Proposes Increases in Maximum Civil Penalties

Client Alert | 2 min read | 09.10.12

This past Friday the Federal Register published the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's (NHTSA) notice of proposed rulemaking to increase the maximum civil penalties allowable for violations of certain statutes it administers. The proposed rule would adjust the maximum civil penalties for inflation, as required by the Federal Civil Monetary Penalty Inflation Adjustment Act. The proposed rule would provide the following penalty maximum increases:


Rules

Current Maximum Penalty

Proposed Maximum Penalty

Motor Vehicle Safety Rules

49 U.S.C. § 30112, 30115, 30117-30122, 30123(a), 30125(c), 30127, 30141-30147

  • Single per-day violation: $6,000
  • Series of related violations: $16,375,000
  • Single per-day violation: $7,000
  • Series of related violations: $17,350,000;

School Buses

49 U.S.C. § 30112(a)(1), (a)(2)
  • Series of related violations: $16,650,000
  • Series of related violations: $17,250,000

Inspections, Investigations and Records

49 U.S.C. § 30166
  • Single per-day violation: $6,000
  • Series of related violations: $16,375,000
  • Single per-day violation: $7,000
  • Series of related violations: $17,350,000

Bumper Standards

49 U.S.C. § 32506(a)
  • Series of related violations: $1,175,000
  • Series of related violations: $1,225,000

Consumer Information

49 U.S.C. § 32308
  • Series of related violations: $575,000
  • Series of related violations: $600,000

Medium- and Heavy-Duty Vehicle Fuel Efficiency

49 C.F.R. § 535
  • None codified
  • Series of related violations: $37,500 per vehicle or engine


Comments on the proposed rule are due on October 9, 2012. The proposed rule would take effect thirty days after its final publication in the Federal Register. Though no specific date is identified, the Agency anticipates the revised civil penalties to be in place by December 31, 2012.

Contacts

Insights

Client Alert | 4 min read | 02.20.26

SCOTUS Holds IEEPA Tariffs Unlawful

On February 20, 2026, the Supreme Court issued a pivotal ruling in Trump v. V.O.S. Selections, negating the President’s ability to impose tariffs under IEEPA. The case stemmed from President Trump’s invocation of IEEPA to levy tariffs on imports from Canada, Mexico, China, and other countries, citing national emergencies. Challengers argued—and the Court agreed—that IEEPA does not delegate tariff authority to the President. The power to tariff is vested in Congress by the Constitution and cannot be delegated to the President absent express authority from Congress....

View All Insights