1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |NHTSA Proposes Increases in Maximum Civil Penalties

NHTSA Proposes Increases in Maximum Civil Penalties

Client Alert | 1 min read | 09.10.12

This past Friday the Federal Register published the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's (NHTSA) notice of proposed rulemaking to increase the maximum civil penalties allowable for violations of certain statutes it administers. The proposed rule would adjust the maximum civil penalties for inflation, as required by the Federal Civil Monetary Penalty Inflation Adjustment Act. The proposed rule would provide the following penalty maximum increases:


Rules

Current Maximum Penalty

Proposed Maximum Penalty

Motor Vehicle Safety Rules

49 U.S.C. § 30112, 30115, 30117-30122, 30123(a), 30125(c), 30127, 30141-30147

  • Single per-day violation: $6,000
  • Series of related violations: $16,375,000
  • Single per-day violation: $7,000
  • Series of related violations: $17,350,000;

School Buses

49 U.S.C. § 30112(a)(1), (a)(2)
  • Series of related violations: $16,650,000
  • Series of related violations: $17,250,000

Inspections, Investigations and Records

49 U.S.C. § 30166
  • Single per-day violation: $6,000
  • Series of related violations: $16,375,000
  • Single per-day violation: $7,000
  • Series of related violations: $17,350,000

Bumper Standards

49 U.S.C. § 32506(a)
  • Series of related violations: $1,175,000
  • Series of related violations: $1,225,000

Consumer Information

49 U.S.C. § 32308
  • Series of related violations: $575,000
  • Series of related violations: $600,000

Medium- and Heavy-Duty Vehicle Fuel Efficiency

49 C.F.R. § 535
  • None codified
  • Series of related violations: $37,500 per vehicle or engine


Comments on the proposed rule are due on October 9, 2012. The proposed rule would take effect thirty days after its final publication in the Federal Register. Though no specific date is identified, the Agency anticipates the revised civil penalties to be in place by December 31, 2012.

Contacts

Insights

Client Alert | 3 min read | 07.23.26

Protester Beware: Recent GAO Decision Suggests Traditional “Reasonable Possibility” Prejudice Standard May Be Evolving

It is well established that “[c]ompetitive prejudice is an essential element of every viable protest.” Yet, for decades, the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) has tempered this requirement with two critical corollaries: protesters need only demonstrate a “reasonable possibility” that they were prejudiced by an agency’s actions, and GAO “will resolve doubts regarding prejudice in favor of the protester.” These principles have been consistent features of GAO’s bid protest jurisprudence for more than 30 years. See, e.g., United Int’l Eng'g, Inc., B-245448, Jan. 29, 1992, 71 CPD ¶ 177....

View All Insights