Newly Published SEC Enforcement Manual Addresses E-Discovery
Client Alert | 1 min read | 10.30.08
On October 6, 2008, the Securities and Exchange Commission published on its website its new "Enforcement Manual." Although the SEC had its policies and procedures previously set forth in an internal manual (the SEC "Redbook") for many years, this expansive new publication is more comprehensive and offers further insight into the process at the Division of Enforcement.
The Enforcement Manual specifically addresses E-discovery issues in § 3.2.6.2.3. The Manual "encourages" the Staff to request document productions in electronic format (on CD, DVD or hard drive media) and specifies that the Staff's requests should include the Division's technical data standards. The Manual notes that scanned collections, e-mail or native files produced by parties should be compatible with the software systems used by the Staff, Concordance and Opticon. The Manual adds that the Division has its own technology staff to respond to questions and to assist the Staff's review and management of electronic document productions.
The Manual also provides guidance on bates stamping, privilege logs and business record certifications, including sample declarations for domestic and foreign records.
Click to view the SEC Enforcement Manual [PDF].
Event Notice:
Crowell & Moring partner Jeane Thomas will co-chair the Georgetown Law School's 5th Annual Advanced E-Discovery Institute: The Discovery of ESI Comes of Age. The program is being held in cooperation with The Sedona Conference and will be taking place on November 20-21 at the Doubletree Hotel Crystal City. For more information please visit: https://www.law.georgetown.edu/cle/showEventDetail.cfm?ID=190.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 06.03.26
Important EU Court Judgment Clarifies Rules on Interest Due in Cartel Damages Cases
In a judgment that will have direct and immediate consequences, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has clarified that for all competition damages actions brought after 26 December 2014, interest runs from the date on which the harm occurred. The ruling addressed two important questions: (1) whether national provisions implementing Article 3(2) of the EU Damages Directive — which requires interest to run from the date harm occurred —apply to cases in which the harm preceded the adoption of those provisions; and (2) how the date of harm should be determined in cartel cases involving the purchase of goods at inflated prices.
Client Alert | 2 min read | 06.02.26
SBA OHA Confirms That the Submission Date for a Proposal with Pricing Controls Size Determination
Client Alert | 5 min read | 06.01.26
California Court Upholds Insurer’s Duty to Defend After Covered Claim Is Dismissed
Client Alert | 2 min read | 05.29.26
California Assembly Passes AB 1776, Sending Major Antitrust Bill to the Senate
