New State Security Breach Notification Laws
Client Alert | 1 min read | 09.08.05
Beyond the HIPAA Privacy Rule and the HIPAA Security Rule, health care entities now face potential compliance obligations under an increasing number of state laws requiring notification of security breaches. Following in the footsteps of the California legislature, nineteen other states have now passed security breach notification laws, and there are similar laws pending in eight states whose legislatures are still in session: New Jersey, Massachusetts, Michigan, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.
Each of the recently enacted laws, like the California law, generally require entities to notify promptly the residents of that state if the security, confidentiality or integrity of their personal information – defined similarly by most states with some notable exceptions – has been compromised.
Failure to comply may result not only in enforcement by state officials, but could also result in civil lawsuits – some of the new state laws incorporate a private right of action.
|
|
If your organization loses personal data,
|
The best way to avoid disclosure under the new laws is to avoid the breach in the first place. Therefore, we recommend that as a supplement to existing HIPAA Security measures, health care entities adopt and implement any necessary state-specific procedures for handling the security of personal information generally. Health care entities should also prepare a response plan which includes an established method for notifying individuals when and if their personal information is compromised. Furthermore, most states will accept an existing information security policy if it contains notification provisions that meet the timing requirements of the new laws. If you already have an information security policy, you may wish to review it to ensure it comports with new applicable state law.
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 06.03.26
Important EU Court Judgment Clarifies Rules on Interest Due in Cartel Damages Cases
In a judgment that will have direct and immediate consequences, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has clarified that for all competition damages actions brought after 26 December 2014, interest runs from the date on which the harm occurred. The ruling addressed two important questions: (1) whether national provisions implementing Article 3(2) of the EU Damages Directive — which requires interest to run from the date harm occurred —apply to cases in which the harm preceded the adoption of those provisions; and (2) how the date of harm should be determined in cartel cases involving the purchase of goods at inflated prices.
Client Alert | 2 min read | 06.02.26
SBA OHA Confirms That the Submission Date for a Proposal with Pricing Controls Size Determination
Client Alert | 5 min read | 06.01.26
California Court Upholds Insurer’s Duty to Defend After Covered Claim Is Dismissed
Client Alert | 2 min read | 05.29.26
California Assembly Passes AB 1776, Sending Major Antitrust Bill to the Senate
