New MLR Final Rule for Community Rated Plans Under FEHBP
Client Alert | 2 min read | 04.03.12
On Monday, April 2, 2012, the U.S. Office of Personnel Management ("OMB") published in the Federal Register final regulations which amend existing Federal Employees Health Benefits ("FEHB") and the Federal Employees Health Benefits Acquisition Regulation ("FEHBAR") provisions related to premium rate-setting methods for community rated plans. With "minor changes" to a June 29, 2011 interim final rule, see 76 Fed. Reg. 38282, the new regulations replace the prior similarly sized subscriber group ("SSSG") rate-setting method with a medical loss ratio ("MLR") calculation.
The updated MLR requirements impose obligations on all community-rated plans, except those subject to "traditional" community rating requirements under state law. The revised MLR regulations, like those embodied in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act ("PPACA"), are designed to offer "a more modern and transparent calculation while still ensuring that the FEHB Program is receiving a fair rate." In addition, OPM anticipates that the MLR requirement "will result in a more streamlined process for plans and increased competition and plan choice for enrollees."
The final regulations make four changes to the prior interim final rules:
- In response to public comments, the final rules do not contain any provision barring consideration of a prior year's MLR in determining that of the current plan year. According to OPM, this change is geared toward providing OPM "flexibility to determine a fair and accurate MLR for each plan in each year."
- The new rules provide a deadline for publication of the FEHPleB-specific MLR requirement. Specifically, the regulations require promulgation of the applicable FEHB-specific MLR threshold 8 months prior for plan year 2013, and twelve calendar months in advance for plan years 2014 and beyond. See 48 C.F.R. § 1602.170-14(b).
- The new regulations include technical changes to certification requirements, applicable to carriers using the MLR methodology, based on changes in timing. Under the new provisions, carriers using the MLR methodology must first submit a "Certificate of Accurate Cost or Pricing Data or Community-Rated Carriers," followed by later submission of a "Certificate of Accurate MLR Calculation." See 48 C.F.R. § 1515,406-2(b).
- The new regulations specifically provide that OPM will issue a separate credibility adjustment, apart from that defined by the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services ("HHS"). See 48 C.F.R. § 1602.170-14(c).
CMS declined to permit plans making MLR rebates under the PPACA health reform law to include any rebate required under that law for the FEHBP to be included as a reduction in premium under the FEHBP-specific MLR calculation. It also declined to permit plans to determine FEHBP MLR results based on a composite of multiple years' experience. OPM will expect plans to follow CMS guidelines for determining how to treat expenditures under the FEHBP MLR rule.
The new rules go into effect on May 2, 2012. For more information, click here to find the final regulations, as published in the Federal Register [PDF].
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 06.12.26
DOJ Guidance Backs Away From Disparate Impact Liability
On June 9, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) issued a formal opinion concluding that the Equal Opportunity Employment Commission’s (EEOC) existing interpretations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) disparate-impact liability, including the Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures (UGESP), are unconstitutional. According to the opinion, EEOC’s prior interpretations contemplate liability based on disproportionately adverse effects alone, without regard to an employer’s likely intent, rather than treating disparate impact as an evidentiary mechanism to “smoke out” intentional discrimination. DOJ found that this approach functions as a “qualified racial-proportionality mandate” that places “a racial thumb on the scales, often requiring employers to evaluate the racial outcomes of their policies, and to make decisions based on (because of) those racial outcomes.” The opinion fulfills one mandate of Executive Order 14281, which rejected disparate-impact liability insofar as it “creates a near insurmountable presumption that unlawful discrimination exists wherever there are any differences in outcomes among different [demographic groups].”
Client Alert | 4 min read | 06.12.26
Auto Dealers: The FTC Is Back in the Driver’s Seat — Warning Letters Signal Renewed Federal Scrutiny
Client Alert | 13 min read | 06.12.26
Client Alert | 4 min read | 06.12.26
