1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |New Jersey Adopts the Uniform Trade Secrets Act

New Jersey Adopts the Uniform Trade Secrets Act

Client Alert | 1 min read | 01.31.12

On January 9, 2012, Governor Chris Christie signed into law the New Jersey Trade Secrets Act ("NJTSA"), which is modeled after the Uniform Trade Secrets Act ("UTSA").  New Jersey joins 45 other states and the District of Columbia in enacting a trade secret statute modeled on the UTSA.

The NJTSA generally follows the UTSA, but with a few key differences.

  • The NJTSA defines a "trade secret" more broadly than the UTSA, and extends protection to various other forms in which trade secrets can exist, including a "design, diagram, drawing, invention, plan, procedure, [or] prototype."
  • The NJTSA augments, rather than displaces, New Jersey common law remedies for misappropriation of a trade secret.
  • The NJTSA is silent as to whether courts must seek uniformity with other states applying the UTSA. 
  • The NJTSA provides greater clarity about the conduct that may give rise to a trade secrets claim, by expressly distinguishing between "proper" and "improper" means of obtaining trade secrets. Under the NJTSA, acquiring a trade secret by independent invention, reverse engineering, a license, published literature, or public observation is a complete defense.
  • The NJTSA provides a presumption in favor of granting protective orders to preserve the secrecy of an alleged trade secret during litigation.

Only four states remain without a statute modeled after the UTSA – Massachusetts, North Carolina, New York, and Texas. 

Insights

Client Alert | 7 min read | 10.29.26

7th EU Competition Law Conference, co-hosted by Crowell & Moring, King’s College London and the Competition Law Center at George Washington University

On 8 October 2026, Crowell & Moring, King's College London, and the Competition Law Center at George Washington University co-hosted the 7th EU Competition Law Conference at De Warande in Brussels. Mark Meador, Commissioner at the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC), delivered the opening keynote address, followed by four panels bringing together practitioners, regulators, academics, and in-house counsel to discuss the latest developments in EU, UK, and US competition law enforcement. Among other things, the panels examined algorithmic pricing; the European Commission's (Commission) new guidelines on exclusionary abuses under Article 102 TFEU (Article 102 Guidelines); the impact of dominant positions in merger reviews; and lessons from the enforcement of the Digital Markets Act (DMA) and the UK’s Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act. ...