New Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification Form Required as of May 7, 2013
Client Alert | 3 min read | 05.06.13
Effective May 7, 2013, a revised Employment Eligibility Verification Form (Form I-9) becomes mandatory and all employers must begin using the new Form as of that date. Among the changes implemented on the new Form I-9 are new data fields for the employee to complete, such as e-mail address, telephone number and foreign passport number. Although the new Form I-9 has not changed significantly from its prior iteration, employers should review their practices to ensure compliance with the requirements.
Timing
The Form I-9 must be completed for every new hire, even if the employment is only for a short period of time. Newly hired employees must complete and sign Section 1 of the Form I-9 no later than the first day of employment. It is important to note that Section 1 should never be completed before the employee has accepted a job offer. Employers must make sure that the instructions for the Form I-9 are available to the employee while he or she completes the Form. The employer must complete Section 2 within three days of hire, unless the employee is hired for fewer than three business days. In that case, the employer must complete Section 2 on the first day of employment.
Employer Responsibilities
Employers are also obligated to examine the documentation offered by new hires to demonstrate their identity and eligibility for employment. Employers are not allowed to specify which document(s) they will accept from an employee. The employee can choose which of the approved documents to submit. The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has issued a new Handbook for Employers (Form M-274), which provides a comprehensive guide for completing the Form I-9. This Handbook includes images of sample documents that will assist employers when reviewing an employee's documents. Because employers are required to examine the documents and verify that they appear genuine, the new Handbook is a valuable resource. Employers should, however, be careful not to scrutinize a new hire's documents unnecessarily, as overzealous rejection of documentation could expose the employer to an immigration-related unfair employment practice charge. Employers must accept documents that reasonably appear to be genuine on their face.
In addition to using the new Form I-9, federal contractors and subcontractors will be required to follow special rules for completing and updating the Form I-9 if their contract contains the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) E-Verify clause. For most other employers, the E-Verify program is voluntary. The E-Verify program is an internet-based system that allows U.S. employers to verify the employment eligibility of all newly hired employees. Click here for information on the E-Verify requirements for federal contractors.
Reverification
When an employee's employment authorization has expired, the employer must reverify the authorization in Section 3 of the Form I-9 no later than the date that the employment authorization expires. Given that current employees will have completed the old Form I-9, the employer should examine the new document(s) presented by the employee, enter the information in Section 3 of the current Form-I-9, and retain it with the previously completed Form I-9.
Employers may decide it is a good practice to establish a calendar system to check in with employees whose employment authorization is due to expire in the near future. A note of caution, however, is that employers are not allowed to reverify the following expired documents: a U.S. passport or passport card, an Alien Registration Receipt Card/Permanent Resident Card (Form I-551), or any List B document. Further, employers may not refuse to accept a document because it has an expiration date in the near future.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 5 min read | 12.12.25
Eleventh Circuit Hears Argument on False Claims Act Qui Tam Constitutionality
On the morning of December 12, 2025, the Eleventh Circuit heard argument in United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, LLC, et al., No. 24-13581 (11th Cir. 2025). This case concerns the constitutionality of the False Claims Act (FCA) qui tam provisions and a groundbreaking September 2024 opinion in which the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida held that the FCA’s qui tam provisions were unconstitutional under Article II. See United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Fla. Med. Assocs., LLC, 751 F. Supp. 3d 1293 (M.D. Fla. 2024). That decision, penned by District Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle, was the first success story for a legal theory that has been gaining steam ever since Justices Thomas, Barrett, and Kavanaugh indicated they would be willing to consider arguments about the constitutionality of the qui tam provisions in U.S. ex rel. Polansky v. Exec. Health Res., 599 U.S. 419 (2023). In her opinion, Judge Mizelle held (1) qui tam relators are officers of the U.S. who must be appointed under the Appointments Clause; and (2) historical practice treating qui tam and similar relators as less than “officers” for constitutional purposes was not enough to save the qui tam provisions from the fundamental Article II infirmity the court identified. That ruling was appealed and, after full briefing, including by the government and a bevy of amici, the litigants stepped up to the plate this morning for oral argument.
Client Alert | 8 min read | 12.11.25
Director Squires Revamps the Workings of the U.S. Patent Office
Client Alert | 8 min read | 12.10.25
Creativity You Can Use: CJEU Clarifies Copyright for Applied Art
Client Alert | 4 min read | 12.10.25
Federal Court Strikes Down Interior Order Suspending Wind Energy Development



