New Federal Contractor Minimum Wage Hike Heads to Court
Client Alert | 2 min read | 02.11.22
On February 8, 2022, just days after the Department of Labor’s (“DOL”) Final Rule “Increasing the Minimum Wage for Federal Contractors,” implementing Executive Order (“EO”) 14026, went into effect, five states – Arizona, Idaho, Indiana, Nebraska and South Carolina – filed a lawsuit – in Arizona federal district court, seeking, among other things, a court order invalidating the federal contractor minimum wage Final Rule and EO 14026. As we have covered previously, EO 14026 and DOL’s implementing Final Rule require a $15 hourly minimum wage increase for some, but not all, federal contractor and subcontractor employees on new contracts or existing contracts that renewed after January 30, 2022. These five states argue that EO 14026 exceeds the President’s authority under the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act (“FPASA”) and that Congress has not otherwise delegated authority to the Executive Branch to enact a rule with such wide-sweeping effects on the American economy. By way of example, the States argue that since the current minimum wage in Arizona is $12.80, Nebraska is $9, Idaho and Indiana are $7.25, and South Carolina does not have a state-specific minimum wage, this rule imposes a high economic cost on federal contractors in their respective states. The plaintiff States are seeking, among other things, a nationwide injunction of the Final Rule and EO 14026.
Two days later, on February 10, 2022, Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi, filed a similar challenge to the Final Rule and EO 14026 in Texas federal district court. Notably, in this case, the plaintiff States are only seeking an injunction as to the enforcement of the Final Rule and EO 14026 against federal contractors operating in their respective jurisdictions.
We will continue to watch these cases, amongst other potential litigation developments, related to the implementation of this Final Rule and EO 14026.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 5 min read | 08.21.26
FTC Proposes Enforcement Policy Statement on Personalized Pricing: What Businesses Need to Know
On August 19, 2026, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced a proposed Enforcement Policy Statement on personalized pricing — the practice of companies using consumers’ personal data to set individualized prices, discounts, coupons, or other incentives. The proposed statement, which is open for public comment for 30 days following publication in the Federal Register, marks a major step up in the FTC’s focus on data-driven pricing strategies and puts businesses across industries on notice that undisclosed or inadequately disclosed personalized pricing will not be tolerated. Importantly, while the proposed statement is not a binding legal requirement and does not create new legal obligations, it serves as an enforcement warning that the FTC is prepared to use its existing enforcement authority under Section 5 of the FTC Act (Section 5) and is also a potential harbinger of rulemaking. Businesses that engage in — or are considering — personalized pricing should carefully assess their disclosure practices and data collection procedures against the standards articulated in this statement.
Client Alert | 7 min read | 08.19.26
CMS’s Final Rule Bans Federal Medicaid Funding for Youth Gender-Affirming Care
Client Alert | 2 min read | 08.19.26




