1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |New Federal Contractor Minimum Wage Hike Heads to Court

New Federal Contractor Minimum Wage Hike Heads to Court

Client Alert | 2 min read | 02.11.22

On February 8, 2022, just days after the Department of Labor’s (“DOL”) Final Rule “Increasing the Minimum Wage for Federal Contractors,” implementing Executive Order (“EO”) 14026, went into effect, five states – Arizona, Idaho, Indiana, Nebraska and South Carolina – filed a lawsuit – in Arizona federal district court, seeking, among other things, a court order invalidating  the federal contractor minimum wage Final Rule and EO 14026.  As we have covered previously, EO 14026 and DOL’s implementing Final Rule require a $15 hourly minimum wage increase for some, but not all, federal contractor and subcontractor employees on new contracts or existing contracts that renewed after January 30, 2022.  These five states argue that EO 14026 exceeds the President’s authority under the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act (“FPASA”) and that Congress has not otherwise delegated authority to the Executive Branch to enact a rule with such wide-sweeping effects on the American economy.  By way of example, the States argue that since the current minimum wage in Arizona is $12.80, Nebraska is $9, Idaho and Indiana are $7.25, and South Carolina does not have a state-specific minimum wage, this rule imposes a high economic cost on federal contractors in their respective states.  The plaintiff States are seeking, among other things, a nationwide injunction of the Final Rule and EO 14026.

Two days later, on February 10, 2022, Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi, filed a similar challenge to the Final Rule and EO 14026 in Texas federal district court.  Notably, in this case, the plaintiff States are only seeking an injunction as to the enforcement of the Final Rule and EO 14026 against federal contractors operating in their respective jurisdictions.

We will continue to watch these cases, amongst other potential litigation developments, related to the implementation of this Final Rule and EO 14026.

Insights

Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.21.25

A Sign of What’s to Come? Court Dismisses FCA Retaliation Complaint Based on Alleged Discriminatory Use of Federal Funding

On November 7, 2025, in Thornton v. National Academy of Sciences, No. 25-cv-2155, 2025 WL 3123732 (D.D.C. Nov. 7, 2025), the District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed a False Claims Act (FCA) retaliation complaint on the basis that the plaintiff’s allegations that he was fired after blowing the whistle on purported illegally discriminatory use of federal funding was not sufficient to support his FCA claim. This case appears to be one of the first filed, and subsequently dismissed, following Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche’s announcement of the creation of the Civil Rights Fraud Initiative on May 19, 2025, which “strongly encourages” private individuals to file lawsuits under the FCA relating to purportedly discriminatory and illegal use of federal funding for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in violation of Executive Order 14173, Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity (Jan. 21, 2025). In this case, the court dismissed the FCA retaliation claim and rejected the argument that an organization could violate the FCA merely by “engaging in discriminatory conduct while conducting a federally funded study.” The analysis in Thornton could be a sign of how forthcoming arguments of retaliation based on reporting allegedly fraudulent DEI activity will be analyzed in the future....