New FCA Guidance on COVID-19 Business Interruption Claims
Client Alert | 3 min read | 04.15.20
The UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has today provided guidance to insurers on its expectations with respect to insurers’ conduct in relation to business interruption (BI) insurance. The FCA noted that, based on its conversations with the industry to date, most policies have basic cover, do not cover pandemics, and therefore would have no obligation to pay out in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic. In contrast, under policies where it is clear an insurer has an obligation to pay, the insurer must assess and pay valid Covid-19 claims without delay or face scrutiny from the industry watchdog.1
The FCA’s guidance notes that a key objective of the FCA is to ensure that financial pressures on policyholders are not exacerbated by slow payment. If there are reasonable grounds to pay part of a claim, the guidance states that the FCA would like insurers “to adopt an approach of making an interim payment.” Further, if an insurer disagrees with doing so, it must communicate its grounds for making that decision directly to the FCA, including details of how its decision “represents a fair outcome for customers.” Today’s guidance follows the FCA’s announcement on 19 March 2020 setting out its expectations for insurance firms following the Covid-19 pandemic.2
Today’s announcement also imposes increased obligations for insurance companies to communicate with their customers regarding the nature of the policy they have in place. The FCA stressed that “clear, accurate and timely communication is crucial” and that the FCA is collecting information from insurers to assess how they are interpreting policies. Further, the FCA guidance expressed specific concern for losses suffered by small businesses, noting that the Financial Ombudsman Service may offer the prospect for faster decisions on disputed claims below certain thresholds, and further that the FCA is establishing a new small business unit which will gather intelligence about the treatment of small businesses by insurers and ensure a coordinated response by the FCA to any issues identified.
The key points to take away from the FCA’s guidance therefore are:
- where more extensive business interruption cover has been obtained, insurers should assess and settle claims quickly;
- if a claim cannot be settled in full, quickly, an interim payment in respect of any uncontested aspect should be made;
- where it is clear there is a covered claim and an interim payment will not be made, the insurer must notify the FCA of the reason for its determination and explain how the insurer’s decision is fair to the insured;
- where an insured does not have cover extending to the losses incurred, the insurer should promptly and clearly communicate this to the insured; and
- SME policyholders (those with annual turnover below £6.5m, with less than 50 members of staff or an annual balance sheet of less than £5m) may be able to refer any refused claims to the Financial Ombudsman for independent determination.
Following on from this guidance then, if it is apparent that a policy will cover losses triggered by the pandemic, claims should be dealt with promptly and fairly. Insurers will need to ascertain quickly whether the losses claimed can be established and, if so, whether the correct procedures for notification of claims, provision of evidence, and co-operation with the insurers have been met. In handling all claims, the FCA stressed, insurers must consider very carefully the needs of their customers and show flexibility in treatment of them.
A note of caution:
One word of caution to insurers: It has been reported that a group of brokers and loss adjusters are considering legal action challenging some of the UK’s largest insurance companies’ restrictive interpretation of policy coverage and therefore sufficient care should be given when determining the scope of coverage in place.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.21.25
On November 7, 2025, in Thornton v. National Academy of Sciences, No. 25-cv-2155, 2025 WL 3123732 (D.D.C. Nov. 7, 2025), the District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed a False Claims Act (FCA) retaliation complaint on the basis that the plaintiff’s allegations that he was fired after blowing the whistle on purported illegally discriminatory use of federal funding was not sufficient to support his FCA claim. This case appears to be one of the first filed, and subsequently dismissed, following Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche’s announcement of the creation of the Civil Rights Fraud Initiative on May 19, 2025, which “strongly encourages” private individuals to file lawsuits under the FCA relating to purportedly discriminatory and illegal use of federal funding for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in violation of Executive Order 14173, Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity (Jan. 21, 2025). In this case, the court dismissed the FCA retaliation claim and rejected the argument that an organization could violate the FCA merely by “engaging in discriminatory conduct while conducting a federally funded study.” The analysis in Thornton could be a sign of how forthcoming arguments of retaliation based on reporting allegedly fraudulent DEI activity will be analyzed in the future.
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.20.25
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.20.25
Client Alert | 6 min read | 11.19.25


