New FAR Part 40 to Address Supply Chain and Information Security Requirements
Client Alert | 1 min read | 04.15.24
On April 1, 2024, the Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration (GSA), and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) issued a final rule updating the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to add Part 40 on information security and supply chain security. This first action did not implement any new requirements; however, separate rulemakings will follow to relocate existing information security and supply chain security policies and procedures to the new Part 40. Additionally, new related regulations will be housed in Part 40. These actions suggest that the flow of information security and supply chain regulations is likely to continue unabated for at least the next few years.
As noted, Part 40 will consolidate the various information security and supply chain security regulations currently distributed throughout the FAR. It ultimately will include regulations concerning prohibitions, exclusions, supply chain risk information sharing, safeguarding information, and supply chain security requirements. For example, the Section 889 prohibition and policies would be placed in Part 40, as would provisions implementing Federal Acquisition Supply Chain Security Act exclusion and removal orders.
Supply chain and information risks that are not considered to be related to security, such as labor restrictions, climate risks, and human trafficking, will not be in Part 40 and will continue to be covered in other parts of the FAR.
Insights
Client Alert | 2 min read | 04.29.25
President Trump Issues Executive Order Deprioritizing Disparate Impact Theory of Discrimination
On April 23, 2025, President Trump signed an executive order, Restoring Equality of Opportunity and Meritocracy, declaring it the policy of the United States “to eliminate the use of disparate-impact liability in all contexts to the maximum degree possible to avoid violating the constitution, Federal civil rights laws, and basic American ideals.” The order reasons that “disparate impact liability all but requires individuals and businesses to consider race and engage in racial balancing to avoid potentially crippling legal liability.”
Client Alert | 6 min read | 04.28.25
Client Alert | 3 min read | 04.28.25
Client Alert | 3 min read | 04.25.25