New Exemptions For Foreign Workers
Client Alert | 1 min read | 11.16.07
Since 8 October 2007, new categories of foreign workers are exempt from obtaining a category B work permit in order to be employed in Belgium. In addition, the procedure for obtaining such work permit has been simplified for other categories of foreign workers.
A foreign worker can only be employed in Belgium if he holds a work permit, except if he is exempt from this obligation. There are three different types of work permits.
The most common work permit is the so-called category B work permit, which allows the foreign worker concerned to work for a specific employer for a definite period of time (with a maximum of 12 months). There are, however, a number of exemptions, which allow for a foreign worker to be employed without first obtaining a work permit. Since 8 October 2007, this list of exemptions from the obligation to obtain a category B work permit is extended.
In practice, the most important new exemption is the one that applies to foreign workers employed as executives by Belgian headquarters, provided that their annual salary exceeds 56,187 € (in 2007). Since 8 October 2007, foreign workers who travel to Belgium in order to attend congresses, to receive training or to carry out certain services (assembling and installation of goods, urgent maintenance or reparation works) are also entitled to invoke an exemption. Most exemptions are, however, limited in time and are subject to certain conditions.
For some other categories of foreign workers, no exemptions have been introduced, but the procedure for obtaining the category B work permit was simplified.
However, please note that the duty to notify the foreign workers with the National Office for Social Security (the so-called LIMOSA regulation) remains in effect, with some exceptions. Indeed, unfortunately, the exemptions from the obligation to obtain a work permit were not harmonized with the exemptions under the LIMOSA regulation.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 06.12.26
DOJ Guidance Backs Away From Disparate Impact Liability
On June 9, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) issued a formal opinion concluding that the Equal Opportunity Employment Commission’s (EEOC) existing interpretations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) disparate-impact liability, including the Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures (UGESP), are unconstitutional. According to the opinion, EEOC’s prior interpretations contemplate liability based on disproportionately adverse effects alone, without regard to an employer’s likely intent, rather than treating disparate impact as an evidentiary mechanism to “smoke out” intentional discrimination. DOJ found that this approach functions as a “qualified racial-proportionality mandate” that places “a racial thumb on the scales, often requiring employers to evaluate the racial outcomes of their policies, and to make decisions based on (because of) those racial outcomes.” The opinion fulfills one mandate of Executive Order 14281, which rejected disparate-impact liability insofar as it “creates a near insurmountable presumption that unlawful discrimination exists wherever there are any differences in outcomes among different [demographic groups].”
Client Alert | 4 min read | 06.12.26
Auto Dealers: The FTC Is Back in the Driver’s Seat — Warning Letters Signal Renewed Federal Scrutiny
Client Alert | 13 min read | 06.12.26
Client Alert | 4 min read | 06.12.26


