1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |New Executive Order Promoting Fixed Price Contracting: What It Means for Federal Contractors

New Executive Order Promoting Fixed Price Contracting: What It Means for Federal Contractors

Client Alert | 2 min read | 05.01.26

On April 30, 2026, President Trump issued an executive order (EO) titled Promoting Efficiency, Accountability, and Performance in Federal Contracting, requiring agencies to “default” to fixed-price contracting to “protect taxpayer dollars, hold contractors accountable, and achieve demonstrable returns on investment.” The EO directs new approval processes for contract awards going forward, modification of certain existing contracts, and amendments to the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR).

Default to Fixed-Price or Performance-Based Contracting

For new contracts, the EO requires contracting officers use fixed-price contracts, or “contracts that tie profit to performance-based metrics,” as a default. The EO requires contracting officers to justify the use of other-than-fixed-price contract types in writing to the agency head and, for such contracts over agency-specific thresholds, obtain approval from the relevant agency head.  (The thresholds for agency head approval are, for the U.S. Department of War, $100 million; for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, $35 million; for the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, $25 million; and for all other agencies, $10 million.) 

The EO requires agencies to modify certain existing contracts. The EO directs agencies to identify their top 10 highest-dollar-value contracts issued on an other-than-fixed-price basis and “to the maximum extent practicable and consistent with law, seek to modify, restructure, or renegotiate” those contracts within 90 days, i.e., by July 29, 2026. The renegotiated contracts should “facilitate use of fixed prices and performance-based incentives for contract deliverables to the maximum extent practicable.”

Exceptions and Agency Reporting Requirements

Contracts that support responding to emergencies, major disasters, or contingency operations, and contracts that involve research and development or pre-production development of “major systems” under FAR Parts 34 and 35, are exempt from the EO’s requirements.

The EO requires agencies to report to the Office of Management and Budget semi-annually on justifications for the use of other-than-fixed-price contracting, with the first report within 90 days. The initial report must identify opportunities “for adjusting current non-fixed-price contracts toward fixed-price contracts” beyond the 10 highest-value contracts of which the EO seeks more immediate modification.

FAR Amendments

The EO calls for maximum use of FAR class deviations and requires the Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP) to issue “guidance” implementing the EO within 45 days. But, in a change from prior contracting-focused EOs, the EO also calls for OFPP to amend the FAR within 120 days. 

Next Steps for Contractors

Contractors with contracts awarded on an other-than-fixed-price basis should expect to receive inquiries from their contracting officers or other agency personnel. In the event that contracting officers seek to modify such contracts to fixed price, contractors will want to understand their rights and obligations under current contract terms and carefully review and negotiate any proposed modifications.

Insights

Client Alert | 4 min read | 05.01.26

Federal Court Blocks Trump Administration Policies Restricting Wind and Solar Permitting

A coalition of regional clean energy trade associations — including RENEW Northeast, Alliance for Clean Energy New York, Southern Renewable Energy Association, and Interwest Energy Alliance — along with the Green Energy Consumers Alliance (GECA), filed suit in December 2025 against the Department of the Interior (DOI), the Bureau of Land Management, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), and the Army Corps of Engineers. The complaint alleged that five agency actions, issued in response to a series of executive orders and presidential memoranda beginning on January 20, 2025, violated the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) by arbitrarily halting or restricting federal permitting for wind and solar energy projects. Plaintiffs sought a preliminary injunction to halt enforcement of these policies while the litigation proceeds. See Renew Northeast, et al. v. U.S. Dep’t of Interior, et al., No. 25-cv-13961-DJC,  (D. Mass. Apr. 21, 2026) ECF Dkt. 89....