New CDC Guidance for Employers When Employees Are Potentially Exposed to COVID-19
Client Alert | 2 min read | 04.10.20
On April 8, 2020, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued Interim Guidance for implementing safety practices for critical infrastructure workers who may have been exposed to COVID-19. The CDC advises that these workers (which include both employees and contractors) may be permitted to continue work following potential exposure provided that they remain asymptomatic and the employer monitors these workers and implements additional precautions in the workplace.
The CDC’s guidance defines “potential exposure” as either household or close contact with an individual with confirmed or suspected COVID-19. The timeframe for this contact includes the 48 hours preceding the individual’s first sign of symptoms.
The Guidance states that, prior to and during the work shift for these workers, employers should:
- Pre-screen andmeasure the employee’s temperature and assess symptoms prior to them starting work. Ideally, temperature checks should happen before the individual enters the facility;
- Regularly Monitor the employee’s temperature and symptoms (and have the employee self-monitor under the supervision of their employer’s occupational health program);
- Have the employee wear a facemask at all times while in the workplace for 14 days after the last exposure;
- Have the employee social distance and maintain a 6 feet perimeter as work duties permit in the workplace;
- Clean and disinfect all areas such as offices, bathrooms, common areas and shared electronic equipment routinely; and
- Work with facility maintenance to increase air exchanges in the building.
If the employee becomes sick during the day, the employee should be sent home immediately and all surfaces in the employee’s workplaces should be cleaned and disinfected. Employers are also encouraged to compile information on all persons who have had contact with the ill employee during the time the employee had symptoms as well as two days prior to the first sign of symptoms. The guidance contemplates that other employees with close contact – within six feet of the sick employee – are considered to have been “exposed.”
The CDC’s new guidance provides some helpful guidelines for employers, but employers with essential workforces must still carefully consider processes and methods to best ensure the health and safety of employees who remain in the workplace and how to respond to confirmed or suspected cases within the workforce. We will continue to monitor and provide updated guidance concerning the evolving guidance regarding COVID-19, and we encourage you to reach out to one of the individuals below or your regular Crowell & Moring contact with any questions you may have.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 05.28.26
Earlier this month, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) withdrew a February 2024 Biden administration proposed rule, “Definition of Hazardous Waste Applicable to Corrective Action for Releases From Solid Waste Management Units,” under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).[1] The withdrawn proposal would have revised RCRA corrective action regulations to expressly apply the broader statutory definition of “hazardous waste,” rather than only the narrower regulatory definition. Now, EPA is maintaining the status quo for corrective action under RCRA. However, EPA’s withdrawal of its proposed RCRA hazardous waste definition makes no mention of its corresponding proposal from 2024 to list nine per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) as RCRA hazardous constituents.[2] This disjointed withdrawal, while providing some certainty for regulated entities, does not resolve how EPA plans to address PFAS under the RCRA program.
Client Alert | 8 min read | 05.28.26
Texas Targets Big Tech With Wave of Suits and Investigations, Part of Nationwide Trend
Client Alert | 7 min read | 05.27.26
Colorado Hits Reset on AI Regulation: SB 26-189 Repeals and Reenacts the Colorado AI Act
Client Alert | 3 min read | 05.27.26
Don’t Get Left in the Doghouse: The Federal Circuit’s Global K9 Case and the Duty to Intervene


