NERC Compliance: Internal Controls That Sit on the Shelf Are of Little Value
Client Alert | 2 min read | 02.06.18
The North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) recently issued a Lesson Learned, highlighting a failure of internal controls at a generation facility. The notice serves as a reminder to electric generators and others responsible for compliance with reliability standards that having and implementing internal controls is essential to reliability standard compliance. NERC has in the past reminded the industry of the importance of having well-designed controls, and the need to ensure that the personnel responsible for implementing the reliability standards understand and implement such controls. The Lesson Learned highlights a failure to implement existing internal controls during battery maintenance that ultimately resulted in progressive voltage drops over transmission lines and damage to generating units. The generator apparently had adequate written internal controls that should have mitigated or prevented this event, but responsible personnel did not have or follow those written procedures during the maintenance.
In its Enterprise Guide for Internal Controls, NERC advised that operational and compliance performance, and thereby reliability, is improved when a registered entity designs and implements effective internal controls. Moreover, the presence of effective internal controls has the potential to result in lighter-handed compliance oversight by NERC and its Regional Entities, such as subjecting only the standards that govern operations of greatest reliability risk to scrutiny in an audit or other compliance monitoring process. Effective internal controls also have the potential to mitigate penalties if reliability standards violations nevertheless occur.
But having well-designed internal controls on paper is only half the battle. Even well-designed internal controls are of little value if they are not implemented, which is what the Lesson Learned highlights. In that case, the generator had a comprehensive switching plan that contained all actions to be performed in connection with opening and closing breakers during battery maintenance, such as checking if alarms were still present during the switching activity. Although the generating station operator responsible for opening and closing breakers during battery maintenance had technical instructions regarding actions to be performed on specific equipment, the operator did not have the switching plan in hand at the time. Further investigation revealed that a number of operators only followed the technical instructions, and not the switching plan. As a result, certain necessary steps were not followed and the station was left without monitoring capabilities for over an hour, during which time the progressive voltage drops went undiagnosed.
Registered entities should consider the following best practices in connection with their internal controls:
- Raise awareness of the existence and purpose of internal controls and why it is important for employees to adhere to them.
- Ensure that employees understand that they are responsible for understanding and implementing internal controls, and that there are consequences for failing to do so.
- Consider periodic training of key personnel to help sensitize staff to the requirements and risks associated with failing to implement NERC-related requirements.
- Ensure that responsible personnel have all necessary internal controls, procedures, and technical documentation in hand when performing key operations.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 5 min read | 12.12.25
Eleventh Circuit Hears Argument on False Claims Act Qui Tam Constitutionality
On the morning of December 12, 2025, the Eleventh Circuit heard argument in United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, LLC, et al., No. 24-13581 (11th Cir. 2025). This case concerns the constitutionality of the False Claims Act (FCA) qui tam provisions and a groundbreaking September 2024 opinion in which the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida held that the FCA’s qui tam provisions were unconstitutional under Article II. See United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Fla. Med. Assocs., LLC, 751 F. Supp. 3d 1293 (M.D. Fla. 2024). That decision, penned by District Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle, was the first success story for a legal theory that has been gaining steam ever since Justices Thomas, Barrett, and Kavanaugh indicated they would be willing to consider arguments about the constitutionality of the qui tam provisions in U.S. ex rel. Polansky v. Exec. Health Res., 599 U.S. 419 (2023). In her opinion, Judge Mizelle held (1) qui tam relators are officers of the U.S. who must be appointed under the Appointments Clause; and (2) historical practice treating qui tam and similar relators as less than “officers” for constitutional purposes was not enough to save the qui tam provisions from the fundamental Article II infirmity the court identified. That ruling was appealed and, after full briefing, including by the government and a bevy of amici, the litigants stepped up to the plate this morning for oral argument.
Client Alert | 8 min read | 12.11.25
Director Squires Revamps the Workings of the U.S. Patent Office
Client Alert | 8 min read | 12.10.25
Creativity You Can Use: CJEU Clarifies Copyright for Applied Art
Client Alert | 4 min read | 12.10.25
Federal Court Strikes Down Interior Order Suspending Wind Energy Development

