Mayor Eric Adams Expands New York City Anti-Discrimination Law
Client Alert | 2 min read | 06.13.23
On May 26, 2023, New York City Mayor Eric Adams signed a bill into law expanding the New York City Human Rights Law (Human Rights Law) to prohibit discrimination on the basis of height and weight. The law goes into effect on November 22, 2023, and will prohibit discrimination on the basis of height and weight in employment, public accommodations, and housing. The law will apply to the following covered entities—New York City employers, employment agencies, and labor organizations, and it prohibits them from denying employment opportunities, refusing to hire, or otherwise discriminating against individuals because of height or weight.
Exceptions
There are exceptions to the Law, notably it will not apply to actions by covered entities when determinations based on height and weight are:
- required by federal, state, or local law or regulation, or
- permitted by regulation adopted by the New York City Human Rights Commission (Commission) identifying particular jobs or categories of jobs for which:
- a person’s height or weight could prevent the performance of the essential requisites of the job, and
- the Commission has not found alternative action that covered entities could reasonably take to allow persons who do not meet the height or weight criteria to perform the essential requirements of the job or category of jobs, or
- permitted by regulation adopted by the Commission identifying particular jobs or categories of jobs for which consideration of height or weight criteria is reasonably necessary for the execution of the normal operations of such covered entity.
Additionally, in instances where a covered entity’s action is not required or permitted by federal, state or local law or regulation, employers may raise affirmative defenses against claims of discrimination on these bases. Specifically, a covered entity may assert that “a person’s height or weight prevents the person from performing the essential requisites of the job, and there is no alternative action the covered entity could reasonably take that would allow the person to perform the essential requisites of the job,” or that “the covered entity’s decision based on height or weight criteria is reasonably necessary for the execution of the normal operations of such covered entity.” This provision does not prevent a covered entity from offering incentives to support weight management as part of a wellness program.
Takeaways
New York City employers should remove any references to height or weight, not otherwise covered by one of the exceptions described above, from their application and hiring materials, handbooks and other human resource material. All covered entities are also advised to review their policies and practices in anticipation of the November 22, 2023 effective date.
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 06.12.26
DOJ Guidance Backs Away From Disparate Impact Liability
On June 9, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) issued a formal opinion concluding that the Equal Opportunity Employment Commission’s (EEOC) existing interpretations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) disparate-impact liability, including the Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures (UGESP), are unconstitutional. According to the opinion, EEOC’s prior interpretations contemplate liability based on disproportionately adverse effects alone, without regard to an employer’s likely intent, rather than treating disparate impact as an evidentiary mechanism to “smoke out” intentional discrimination. DOJ found that this approach functions as a “qualified racial-proportionality mandate” that places “a racial thumb on the scales, often requiring employers to evaluate the racial outcomes of their policies, and to make decisions based on (because of) those racial outcomes.” The opinion fulfills one mandate of Executive Order 14281, which rejected disparate-impact liability insofar as it “creates a near insurmountable presumption that unlawful discrimination exists wherever there are any differences in outcomes among different [demographic groups].”
Client Alert | 4 min read | 06.12.26
Auto Dealers: The FTC Is Back in the Driver’s Seat — Warning Letters Signal Renewed Federal Scrutiny
Client Alert | 13 min read | 06.12.26
Client Alert | 4 min read | 06.12.26
