Material Misrepresentation Dooms Contract From the Get-Go
Client Alert | 1 min read | 02.07.19
In ABS Dev. Corp. (January 7, 2019), the ASBCA found a contract void ab initio because the contractor’s proposal contained a material misrepresentation about staffing. Although failure to perform in accordance with an incorporated proposal is generally only a breach, the Board noted that where a contractor obtains a contract through a material misrepresentation––with no intention of performing in accordance with the representation––the contract is void ab initio. Here, the Board found ABS’ contract void ab initio because: (1) ABS, to address contracting officer concerns regarding staffing approach in its proposal, represented that it would directly hire personnel to perform on-site work; (2) ABS did not have any intention to adhere to such representation; and (3) had ABS not made such representation, the contracting officer would not have awarded ABS the contract. Because no valid contract ever existed, ABS’ claim for additional compensation was denied and the Government's assessment of liquidated damages was likewise denied.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.21.25
On November 7, 2025, in Thornton v. National Academy of Sciences, No. 25-cv-2155, 2025 WL 3123732 (D.D.C. Nov. 7, 2025), the District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed a False Claims Act (FCA) retaliation complaint on the basis that the plaintiff’s allegations that he was fired after blowing the whistle on purported illegally discriminatory use of federal funding was not sufficient to support his FCA claim. This case appears to be one of the first filed, and subsequently dismissed, following Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche’s announcement of the creation of the Civil Rights Fraud Initiative on May 19, 2025, which “strongly encourages” private individuals to file lawsuits under the FCA relating to purportedly discriminatory and illegal use of federal funding for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in violation of Executive Order 14173, Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity (Jan. 21, 2025). In this case, the court dismissed the FCA retaliation claim and rejected the argument that an organization could violate the FCA merely by “engaging in discriminatory conduct while conducting a federally funded study.” The analysis in Thornton could be a sign of how forthcoming arguments of retaliation based on reporting allegedly fraudulent DEI activity will be analyzed in the future.
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.20.25
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.20.25
Client Alert | 6 min read | 11.19.25
