1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Maine's Discount Drug Program Struck Down

Maine's Discount Drug Program Struck Down

Client Alert | 1 min read | 01.07.03

The Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit has upheld the challenge of the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America ("PhRMA") to the Maine Medicaid demonstration project which sought to offer low-income citizens a discount on prescription drugs, funded in part by manufacturer rebates and in part by a 2% state subsidy. Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America v. Tommy G. Thompson, Dkt. No. 02-5110 (Dec. 24, 2002). http://laws.findlaw.com/dc/025110.html

PhRMA claimed that Maine's program mirrored a Vermont demonstration project which the same court had already struck down as inconsistent with the Social Security Act's Medicaid provisions. ("PhRMA I"). PhRMA sues HHS to force federal disapproval of the program. The District Court rejected PhRMA's challenges and granted summary judgement to the Secretary of HHS. The Court of Appeals reversed the District Court decision finding the Maine Prescription Drug Discount Program ("PDDP") violated the Social Security Act by requiring drug manufacturers to pay rebates to the state without requiring the state or the federal government to make Medicaid payments. A central goal of Maine's project design was to provide a prescription drug benefit without creating net costs for the State, the Court noted.

The record showed that Maine's original program mirrored the Vermont program. After PhRMA I, Maine revised the program to include a 2% state contribution to the drug manufacturer rebates in order to avoid a similar fate. The Secretary, however, never approved this modification. Furthermore, the court found the 2% contribution did not revise the PDDP to be "meaningfully different" from the Vermont program because the contribution was not guaranteed by state law or an official component of the PDDP, and could be changed or discontinued at any time. The Court of Appeals held that "Maine's only federally approved version of PDDP mirrors Vermont's legally flawed program, i.e., one in which all costs are covered by drug discount rebates, with no required state or federal "payments" under Medicaid."

Insights

Client Alert | 2 min read | 03.23.26

ACTS Survey Compliance Deadline Temporarily Extended: What Higher Education Institutions Need to Know

On March 13, a Massachusetts federal district court temporarily blocked the Trump Administration from requiring higher education institutions to respond to the Admissions and Consumer Transparency Supplement (“ACTS”) survey — a new data collection effort mandating that institutions disclose detailed admissions information regarding students’ race and sex to the federal government. In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Department of Education, 1:26-cv-11229 (D. Mass.), the court extended the deadline for institutions to respond to the survey from March 18th to March 25th to allow time to consider the case....