1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Made of Steel – New Buy American Act Rules Change Analysis and Increase Barriers to Offers of Foreign Manufactured End Products and Construction Material, Particularly for Iron or Steel Products

Made of Steel – New Buy American Act Rules Change Analysis and Increase Barriers to Offers of Foreign Manufactured End Products and Construction Material, Particularly for Iron or Steel Products

Client Alert | 1 min read | 09.14.20

Today, nearly 8 months after the deadline, the FAR Council has issued a proposed rule to implement E.O. 13881 (July 15, 2019) requiring consideration of increasing both the domestic content requirement under the Buy American Act and the associated price preference provided to domestic products. The proposed rule will do both and include new provisions applicable to end products or construction material “predominantly of iron or steel or a combination of both.” Most significantly, the proposed rule will:

  • Require non-COTS domestic end products and construction material to include domestic components that exceed 55% of the cost of all components for the end product; COTS end products, with the notable exception of the new category of items “predominantly of iron or steel or a combination of both” will continue to need only be manufactured in the United States to qualify as domestic.
  • Require domestic end products or construction material (including COTS items but except fasteners) consisting “predominately of iron or steel or a combination of both” to be manufactured in the U.S. and not incorporate foreign iron or steel that comprises 5% (on an estimated basis) or more of the costs of all components of the end product. To qualify as an item “predominately of iron or steel or combination of both” the total cost of iron and steel content in the item must exceed 50% of the cost of all components. Similar to rules applicable to Recovery Act procurements and DOT-funded programs, to qualify as domestic iron or steel “all manufacturing processes of the iron or steel must take place in the United States, except metallurgical processes involving refinement of steel additives.”
  • Fasteners are considered COTS products and need only be manufactured in the U.S.; the source of components, including the iron or steel does not matter.
  • The evaluation cost penalty for offers of end products or construction material that do not qualify as domestic is increased from 6% to 20%, and from 12% to 30% where the potential domestic awardee for the end product qualifies as a small business.

The comment period for the proposed rule extends through November 13, 2020.

Contacts

Insights

Client Alert | 3 min read | 06.12.26

DOJ Guidance Backs Away From Disparate Impact Liability

On June 9, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) issued a formal opinion concluding that the Equal Opportunity Employment Commission’s (EEOC) existing interpretations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) disparate-impact liability, including the Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures (UGESP), are unconstitutional. According to the opinion, EEOC’s prior interpretations contemplate liability based on disproportionately adverse effects alone, without regard to an employer’s likely intent, rather than treating disparate impact as an evidentiary mechanism to “smoke out” intentional discrimination. DOJ found that this approach functions as a “qualified racial-proportionality mandate” that places “a racial thumb on the scales, often requiring employers to evaluate the racial outcomes of their policies, and to make decisions based on (because of) those racial outcomes.” The opinion fulfills one mandate of Executive Order 14281, which rejected disparate-impact liability insofar as it “creates a near insurmountable presumption that unlawful discrimination exists wherever there are any differences in outcomes among different [demographic groups].”...

View All Insights