Made in USA Settlement for Chinese Imports
Client Alert | 3 min read | 04.15.21
Promotional products seller Gennex Media LLC and its owner, Akil Kurji, have settled Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) charges that they made false, misleading, or unsupported advertising claims that their “Brandnex” customizable promotional products were “all or virtually all” made in the United States. Despite numerous claims that the company’s novelty items were “Made in the USA,” “USA Made,” and “Manufactured Right Here in America!”, the items were wholly imported from China.
The settlement requires Gennex and Kurji to pay the FTC a monetary judgment of $146,249.24. In addition to the payment, the parties are required to follow post-settlement remediation measures. Some of these measures include: (1) providing customer information to the FTC in order to ensure proper customer redress; (2) submitting compliance reports to the FTC one year post-settlement; and (3) maintaining certain business records for five years.
The settlement also prohibits Gennex and Kurji from making misrepresentations regarding U.S.-origin claims and making misleading and unsubstantiated country-of-origin representations. The terms provide guidance to retailers making representations about origin claims:
- Unqualified U.S.-origin claims for any product must show that the product’s final assembly or processing—and all significant processing—takes place in the United States, and that all or virtually all ingredients or components of the product are made and sourced in the United States.
- Qualified “Made in USA” claims must include a clear and conspicuous disclosure immediately adjacent to the representation that accurately conveys the extent to which the product contains foreign parts, ingredients or components, or processing.
- Products claiming to be assembled in the United States must ensure that these products are last substantially transformed in the United States, their principal assembly takes place in the United States, and U.S. assembly operations are substantial.
This action comes approximately a month after the FTC’s largest ever “Made in USA” judgment. The $1.2 million settlement was against glue manufacturer Chemence after it violated a 2016 order involving deceptively labeled glue products whose inputs were imported. These examples show the FTC’s increased focus on enforcing against misleading “Made in USA” claims.
The FTC’s June 2020 notice of proposed rulemaking regarding unqualified “Made in USA” claims also shows that this area will continue to be even more of an enforcement priority in the future. The proposed Rule incorporates guidance set forth in the Commission’s previous Decisions and Orders and its 1997 Enforcement Policy Statement on U.S. Origin Claims.
The Rule will prohibit marketers from including unqualified “Made in USA” claims on labels unless: (1) final assembly or processing of the product occurs in the United States; (2) all significant processing that goes into the product occurs in the United States; and (3) all or virtually all ingredients or components of the product are made and sourced in the United States. Additional information on the FTC’s “Made in USA” guidelines can be found here.
Senators have also pushed for “Made in USA” regulation changes. On February 8, 2021, Senator Mike Lee (R-Utah) and Angus King (I-Maine), introduced a bill to amend Commerce and Trade Code § 45a. The amendment seeks to create a single national standard for “Made in the USA” claims. The bill is identical to S.4065, which passed the Senate last year with bipartisan support but then lost momentum.
More information on the final consent order settling charges against Gennex Media LLC and Owner Akil Kurji can be found here.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 4 min read | 06.25.26
Twin Executive Orders Seek to Spur Quantum Leap in Technology and Cybersecurity
On June 22, 2026, President Trump signed two executive orders, “Securing the Nation Against Advanced Cryptographic Attacks” (Quantum Security EO) and “Ushering in the Next Frontier of Quantum Innovation” (Quantum Innovation EO), marking the most significant federal action on quantum technology since the Quantum Computing Cybersecurity Preparedness Act of 2022, which directed agencies to harden their information systems against quantum-enabled hacking. The orders seek to speed the development of quantum computers, which are advanced processors that can calculate multiple possibilities simultaneously and thus solve problems exponentially faster than traditional computers. At the same time, the orders look to protect against the danger that quantum technology can “break” traditional encryption by easily decoding it. Of particular note for government contractors, the Quantum Security EO directs agencies to update federal acquisition regulations to require contractors by 2031 to adopt information processing standards that resist quantum-enabled codebreaking.
Client Alert | 7 min read | 06.24.26
Client Alert | 3 min read | 06.24.26
Client Alert | 4 min read | 06.23.26
EPA Hands Over AI Data Center Regulation to States and Communities to Develop Best Practices


