Lost Profits Not Recoverable For Convoyed Sales Without Adequate Relationship Between Components
Client Alert | 1 min read | 01.30.08
In American Seating Co. v. USSC Group, Inc. (Nos. 2007-1112, 2007-1135; January 29, 2008), the Federal Circuit affirms, inter alia, a motion for judgment as a matter of law setting aside a portion of a jury verdict compensating patentee American Seating for convoyed sales of passenger seats related to USSC's infringement of a patent for an ADA-compliant, wheelchair restraint device for mass transit vehicles.
The Court observes that a "patentee may recover lost profits on unpatented components sold with a patented item, a convoyed sale, if both the patented and unpatented products 'together were considered to be components of a single assembly or parts of a complete machine, or they together constituted a functional unit.'" Reviewing the evidence, the Court notes that the patent does not cover passenger seats, the restraint device operates independently of the passenger seats, and bus buyers do not require passenger seats and restraint devices be purchased from the same company. Thus, without an interrelated or functional relationship between the seats and the restraint device, the Court finds that "the district court was correct that the jury has no basis to conclude that lost profits on collateral sales of passenger seats were due American Seating."
Insights
Client Alert | 6 min read | 11.19.25
The facts before the Third Circuit in the recently decided case of Patel v. United States illustrate how parties can put themselves in a bind if they make factual admissions when resolving a criminal case involving fraud on the government while not simultaneously resolving the government’s civil claims under the False Claims Act (FCA) for the same underlying conduct.
Client Alert | 4 min read | 11.18.25
DOJ Announces Major Enforcement Actions Targeting North Korean Remote IT Worker Schemes
Client Alert | 6 min read | 11.18.25
Client Alert | 2 min read | 11.14.25
