Join Crowell & Moring for a Webinar on New Executive Orders
Client Alert | 1 min read | 09.09.14
Please join us on Thursday, September 11, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m., as Crowell & Moring presents the webinar, "Federal Contracting Policy By Executive Order: What Does It Mean for Contractors?" A panel of Crowell & Moring attorneys with experience in government contracts, public policy, and employment law will discuss the use of executive orders by the Obama Administration and its predecessors; evaluate several recent EOs targeting contractor labor law compliance, including the "Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces" executive order (previously discussed here and here); discuss potential new EOs on the horizon; and talk about what, if any, measures contractors and other interested parties can take to influence or challenge the substantive provisions of recent executive orders.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 06.12.26
DOJ Guidance Backs Away From Disparate Impact Liability
On June 9, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) issued a formal opinion concluding that the Equal Opportunity Employment Commission’s (EEOC) existing interpretations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) disparate-impact liability, including the Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures (UGESP), are unconstitutional. According to the opinion, EEOC’s prior interpretations contemplate liability based on disproportionately adverse effects alone, without regard to an employer’s likely intent, rather than treating disparate impact as an evidentiary mechanism to “smoke out” intentional discrimination. DOJ found that this approach functions as a “qualified racial-proportionality mandate” that places “a racial thumb on the scales, often requiring employers to evaluate the racial outcomes of their policies, and to make decisions based on (because of) those racial outcomes.” The opinion fulfills one mandate of Executive Order 14281, which rejected disparate-impact liability insofar as it “creates a near insurmountable presumption that unlawful discrimination exists wherever there are any differences in outcomes among different [demographic groups].”
Client Alert | 4 min read | 06.12.26
Auto Dealers: The FTC Is Back in the Driver’s Seat — Warning Letters Signal Renewed Federal Scrutiny
Client Alert | 13 min read | 06.12.26
Client Alert | 4 min read | 06.12.26


