Join Crowell & Moring for a Webinar on New Executive Orders
Client Alert | 1 min read | 09.09.14
Please join us on Thursday, September 11, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m., as Crowell & Moring presents the webinar, "Federal Contracting Policy By Executive Order: What Does It Mean for Contractors?" A panel of Crowell & Moring attorneys with experience in government contracts, public policy, and employment law will discuss the use of executive orders by the Obama Administration and its predecessors; evaluate several recent EOs targeting contractor labor law compliance, including the "Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces" executive order (previously discussed here and here); discuss potential new EOs on the horizon; and talk about what, if any, measures contractors and other interested parties can take to influence or challenge the substantive provisions of recent executive orders.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.21.25
On November 7, 2025, in Thornton v. National Academy of Sciences, No. 25-cv-2155, 2025 WL 3123732 (D.D.C. Nov. 7, 2025), the District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed a False Claims Act (FCA) retaliation complaint on the basis that the plaintiff’s allegations that he was fired after blowing the whistle on purported illegally discriminatory use of federal funding was not sufficient to support his FCA claim. This case appears to be one of the first filed, and subsequently dismissed, following Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche’s announcement of the creation of the Civil Rights Fraud Initiative on May 19, 2025, which “strongly encourages” private individuals to file lawsuits under the FCA relating to purportedly discriminatory and illegal use of federal funding for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in violation of Executive Order 14173, Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity (Jan. 21, 2025). In this case, the court dismissed the FCA retaliation claim and rejected the argument that an organization could violate the FCA merely by “engaging in discriminatory conduct while conducting a federally funded study.” The analysis in Thornton could be a sign of how forthcoming arguments of retaliation based on reporting allegedly fraudulent DEI activity will be analyzed in the future.
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.20.25
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.20.25
Client Alert | 6 min read | 11.19.25


