Iran Sanctions Enforcement and Reinsurance
Client Alert | 1 min read | 02.03.11
In the first publicly-announced resolution of an enforcement action involving the reinsurance industry, the Office of Foreign Assets Control ("OFAC") yesterday announced a $36,000 settlement with Aon International Energy, Inc. According to OFAC, Aon Energy "facilitated the placement of coverage and the payment of premiums for facultative retrocession reinsurance" related to petrochemical projects in Iran on Kharg Island. Aon Energy acted as a broker on behalf of a European reinsurance company in placing facultative retrocession reinsurance with two European retrocessionaires.
The announcement is important for a number of reasons. As the first enforcement action in the reinsurance industry, it reflects OFAC’s longstanding interest in and focus on the industry. It is also likely to be the first of many actions involving reinsurance. As a facultative case, the Aon case illustrates perhaps the most straightforward application of OFAC's rules to reinsurance; in contrast to treaty-based reinsurance, facultative placement, in OFAC's view, permits US persons to manage OFAC risk directly. How OFAC addresses other aspects of the reinsurance industry will no doubt build on this case. OFAC has taken the position that parties to a treaty reinsurance contract can and should deal with trade restrictions by including specific geographic exclusions in defining the scope of the treaty.
From an enforcement policy standpoint, the case is of interest because OFAC noted in its announcement that the reinsurance transactions were "particularly harmful to the sanctions program," that it was not voluntarily disclosed, but that Aon Energy, under direction of its parent company, cooperated and "strengthened" its compliance program and its existing OFAC procedures. Finally, OFAC's announcement notes that Aon cooperated with OFAC and agreed to toll the statute of limitations.
For reinsurance compliance questions, please contact those listed below.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 8 min read | 09.09.25
On September 5, 2025, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) withdrew its appeals of decisions issued by Texas and Florida federal district courts, which enjoined the FTC from enforcing a nationwide rule banning almost all noncompete employment agreements. Companies, however, should not read this decision to mean that their noncompete agreements will no longer be subjected to antitrust scrutiny by federal enforcers. In a statement joined by Commissioner Melissa Holyoak, Chairman Andrew Ferguson stressed that the FTC “will continue to enforce the antitrust laws aggressively against noncompete agreements” and warned that “firms in industries plagued by thickets of noncompete agreements will receive [in the coming days] warning letters from me, urging them to consider abandoning those agreements as the Commission prepares investigations and enforcement actions.”
Client Alert | 12 min read | 09.09.25
Client Alert | 7 min read | 09.08.25
California’s Climate Disclosure Laws Continue to Roll Forward
Client Alert | 3 min read | 09.08.25
RADV Audits: Implications and Recommendations for Medicare Advantage Organizations
