1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Government Sees $104 Million Verdict Vanish After Its Theory of Liability Is Rejected Post-Trial

Government Sees $104 Million Verdict Vanish After Its Theory of Liability Is Rejected Post-Trial

Client Alert | 1 min read | 01.08.15

U.S. ex rel. Bunk v. Birkart Globalistics, an FCA case spanning twelve years and two jury trials, came to an apparent end when the district court set aside the jury's verdict and damages award of $104 million, ruling that the government's theory of liability failed as a matter of law. The government's upset "expectations" of competitive bidding was itself an insufficient ground for a finding of falsity, and the government failed to show that any of the cargo carriers bidding on the contracts "presented a claim for payment based on a prime rate that was, in fact, inflated because of Gosselin's alleged conduct" and failed to present sufficient evidence of damages.


Insights

Client Alert | 7 min read | 01.05.26

Consideration of Artificial Intelligence in Arbitration Terms of Reference

As artificial intelligence (AI) continues to evolve and integrate into various aspects of legal practice, counsel and arbitral tribunals drawing up their Terms of Reference (TOR) establishing the terms of the dispute being referred to arbitration and also formulating their procedural orders should consider the implications of AI. This client alert highlights the importance of addressing AI in TOR negotiations and provides an overview of likely topics international arbitration practitioners can expect to treat in TORs and procedural orders....