Government Contracts Intellectual Property: Contractors Beware, Stick to Prescribed Technical Data Marking Legends
Client Alert | 1 min read | 12.21.18
On November 28, 2018, the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals held that certain unique technical data marking legends placed by The Boeing Company and one of its subcontractors on unlimited rights technical data delivered to the Air Force were nonconforming with the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS).
Under the terms of its contract with the Air Force, Boeing was required to deliver certain technical data to the government with unlimited rights. Boeing marked this technical data with unique marking legends, ostensibly to place third parties on notice that, even though the government had unlimited rights, no rights had been granted to third parties. The Air Force rejected the markings as non-conforming, maintaining that the only authorized legends are those found in DFARS 252.227-7013(f), which was incorporated in Boeing’s contract. Boeing argued that DFARS markings did not adequately protect the rights granted to it under the DFARS. In its decision, the board agreed with the Air Force and concluded that under the contract, the specific legends identified in the DFARS and a copyright notice “are the only permissible legends for limiting data rights and no other data rights legends are allowed.” In dicta, the Board also questioned whether the grant of unlimited rights waived Boeing’s trade secret protection of that data vis-à-vis third parties.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 7 min read | 10.29.26
On 8 October 2026, Crowell & Moring, King's College London, and the Competition Law Center at George Washington University co-hosted the 7th EU Competition Law Conference at De Warande in Brussels. Mark Meador, Commissioner at the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC), delivered the opening keynote address, followed by four panels bringing together practitioners, regulators, academics, and in-house counsel to discuss the latest developments in EU, UK, and US competition law enforcement. Among other things, the panels examined algorithmic pricing; the European Commission's (Commission) new guidelines on exclusionary abuses under Article 102 TFEU (Article 102 Guidelines); the impact of dominant positions in merger reviews; and lessons from the enforcement of the Digital Markets Act (DMA) and the UK’s Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act.
Client Alert | 3 min read | 10.29.26
What University Licensors Should Learn From TexasLDPC v. Broadcom
Client Alert | 2 min read | 10.28.26
Debriefing to Dead Briefing: How to Avoid Dismissal by Identifying “Required” Debriefings
Client Alert | 7 min read | 10.27.26
