Germany introduces second domestic turnover threshold for merger control
Client Alert | 1 min read | 02.18.09
On 13 February 2009, the German legislator approved an amendment to the Act against Restraints of Competition ("ARC") that will significantly reduce the need for merger control filings and observation of the statutory waiting period for transactions with focus outside Germany.
Presently, the German turnover thresholds are met if the parties' combined worldwide turnover in the last calendar year exceeds € 500 million (approx. US$ 735 million) and if any of the parties achieves sales in Germany in excess of € 25 million (approx. US$ 36.7 million). Accordingly, Germany has been one of the few countries in the world where the filing thresholds could be triggered by one of the parties, e.g. the acquiring group alone. Furthermore, the extensive interpretation of the required 'effects on competition in Germany' has hitherto put a significant administrative burden on many companies meeting the abovementioned thresholds.
Under the new regime two parties to a transaction must have sales of at least € 5 million (approx. US$ 7.35 million) in Germany. It is expected that the introduction of the second domestic sales threshold will significantly reduce the number of transactions that have to be filed with the Bundeskartellamt ("FCO") in Germany. In particular foreign-to-foreign transactions or German purchasers acquiring foreign companies with little business in Germany will in the future be exempted from filing requirements.
The amendment is expected to enter into force in early March after signature by the German president and publication in the official journal. In the interim, companies involved in transactions where the second threshold is not met, may want to consider postponing their closing until the amendment enters into force in order to avoid a German merger filing.
For more information, please contact the professionals listed or your regular Crowell & Moring contacts.
Insights
Client Alert | 5 min read | 12.12.25
Eleventh Circuit Hears Argument on False Claims Act Qui Tam Constitutionality
On the morning of December 12, 2025, the Eleventh Circuit heard argument in United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, LLC, et al., No. 24-13581 (11th Cir. 2025). This case concerns the constitutionality of the False Claims Act (FCA) qui tam provisions and a groundbreaking September 2024 opinion in which the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida held that the FCA’s qui tam provisions were unconstitutional under Article II. See United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Fla. Med. Assocs., LLC, 751 F. Supp. 3d 1293 (M.D. Fla. 2024). That decision, penned by District Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle, was the first success story for a legal theory that has been gaining steam ever since Justices Thomas, Barrett, and Kavanaugh indicated they would be willing to consider arguments about the constitutionality of the qui tam provisions in U.S. ex rel. Polansky v. Exec. Health Res., 599 U.S. 419 (2023). In her opinion, Judge Mizelle held (1) qui tam relators are officers of the U.S. who must be appointed under the Appointments Clause; and (2) historical practice treating qui tam and similar relators as less than “officers” for constitutional purposes was not enough to save the qui tam provisions from the fundamental Article II infirmity the court identified. That ruling was appealed and, after full briefing, including by the government and a bevy of amici, the litigants stepped up to the plate this morning for oral argument.
Client Alert | 8 min read | 12.11.25
Director Squires Revamps the Workings of the U.S. Patent Office
Client Alert | 8 min read | 12.10.25
Creativity You Can Use: CJEU Clarifies Copyright for Applied Art
Client Alert | 4 min read | 12.10.25
Federal Court Strikes Down Interior Order Suspending Wind Energy Development
