Germany introduces second domestic turnover threshold for merger control
Client Alert | 1 min read | 02.18.09
On 13 February 2009, the German legislator approved an amendment to the Act against Restraints of Competition ("ARC") that will significantly reduce the need for merger control filings and observation of the statutory waiting period for transactions with focus outside Germany.
Presently, the German turnover thresholds are met if the parties' combined worldwide turnover in the last calendar year exceeds € 500 million (approx. US$ 735 million) and if any of the parties achieves sales in Germany in excess of € 25 million (approx. US$ 36.7 million). Accordingly, Germany has been one of the few countries in the world where the filing thresholds could be triggered by one of the parties, e.g. the acquiring group alone. Furthermore, the extensive interpretation of the required 'effects on competition in Germany' has hitherto put a significant administrative burden on many companies meeting the abovementioned thresholds.
Under the new regime two parties to a transaction must have sales of at least € 5 million (approx. US$ 7.35 million) in Germany. It is expected that the introduction of the second domestic sales threshold will significantly reduce the number of transactions that have to be filed with the Bundeskartellamt ("FCO") in Germany. In particular foreign-to-foreign transactions or German purchasers acquiring foreign companies with little business in Germany will in the future be exempted from filing requirements.
The amendment is expected to enter into force in early March after signature by the German president and publication in the official journal. In the interim, companies involved in transactions where the second threshold is not met, may want to consider postponing their closing until the amendment enters into force in order to avoid a German merger filing.
For more information, please contact the professionals listed or your regular Crowell & Moring contacts.
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 06.12.26
DOJ Guidance Backs Away From Disparate Impact Liability
On June 9, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) issued a formal opinion concluding that the Equal Opportunity Employment Commission’s (EEOC) existing interpretations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) disparate-impact liability, including the Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures (UGESP), are unconstitutional. According to the opinion, EEOC’s prior interpretations contemplate liability based on disproportionately adverse effects alone, without regard to an employer’s likely intent, rather than treating disparate impact as an evidentiary mechanism to “smoke out” intentional discrimination. DOJ found that this approach functions as a “qualified racial-proportionality mandate” that places “a racial thumb on the scales, often requiring employers to evaluate the racial outcomes of their policies, and to make decisions based on (because of) those racial outcomes.” The opinion fulfills one mandate of Executive Order 14281, which rejected disparate-impact liability insofar as it “creates a near insurmountable presumption that unlawful discrimination exists wherever there are any differences in outcomes among different [demographic groups].”
Client Alert | 4 min read | 06.12.26
Auto Dealers: The FTC Is Back in the Driver’s Seat — Warning Letters Signal Renewed Federal Scrutiny
Client Alert | 13 min read | 06.12.26
Client Alert | 4 min read | 06.12.26
