Germany introduces second domestic turnover threshold for merger control
Client Alert | 1 min read | 02.18.09
On 13 February 2009, the German legislator approved an amendment to the Act against Restraints of Competition ("ARC") that will significantly reduce the need for merger control filings and observation of the statutory waiting period for transactions with focus outside Germany.
Presently, the German turnover thresholds are met if the parties' combined worldwide turnover in the last calendar year exceeds € 500 million (approx. US$ 735 million) and if any of the parties achieves sales in Germany in excess of € 25 million (approx. US$ 36.7 million). Accordingly, Germany has been one of the few countries in the world where the filing thresholds could be triggered by one of the parties, e.g. the acquiring group alone. Furthermore, the extensive interpretation of the required 'effects on competition in Germany' has hitherto put a significant administrative burden on many companies meeting the abovementioned thresholds.
Under the new regime two parties to a transaction must have sales of at least € 5 million (approx. US$ 7.35 million) in Germany. It is expected that the introduction of the second domestic sales threshold will significantly reduce the number of transactions that have to be filed with the Bundeskartellamt ("FCO") in Germany. In particular foreign-to-foreign transactions or German purchasers acquiring foreign companies with little business in Germany will in the future be exempted from filing requirements.
The amendment is expected to enter into force in early March after signature by the German president and publication in the official journal. In the interim, companies involved in transactions where the second threshold is not met, may want to consider postponing their closing until the amendment enters into force in order to avoid a German merger filing.
For more information, please contact the professionals listed or your regular Crowell & Moring contacts.
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.21.25
On November 7, 2025, in Thornton v. National Academy of Sciences, No. 25-cv-2155, 2025 WL 3123732 (D.D.C. Nov. 7, 2025), the District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed a False Claims Act (FCA) retaliation complaint on the basis that the plaintiff’s allegations that he was fired after blowing the whistle on purported illegally discriminatory use of federal funding was not sufficient to support his FCA claim. This case appears to be one of the first filed, and subsequently dismissed, following Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche’s announcement of the creation of the Civil Rights Fraud Initiative on May 19, 2025, which “strongly encourages” private individuals to file lawsuits under the FCA relating to purportedly discriminatory and illegal use of federal funding for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in violation of Executive Order 14173, Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity (Jan. 21, 2025). In this case, the court dismissed the FCA retaliation claim and rejected the argument that an organization could violate the FCA merely by “engaging in discriminatory conduct while conducting a federally funded study.” The analysis in Thornton could be a sign of how forthcoming arguments of retaliation based on reporting allegedly fraudulent DEI activity will be analyzed in the future.
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.20.25
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.20.25
Client Alert | 6 min read | 11.19.25
