1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |GDPR Compliance: The Beginning – Not the End

GDPR Compliance: The Beginning – Not the End

Client Alert | 2 min read | 05.25.18

Although the current focus of many companies regarding the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) is on the May 25, 2018 effective date, we see that date as the beginning, not the end, of implementing a global GDPR compliance program. First, the risk-based GDPR framework for privacy and data security is an ongoing compliance process, not a “one-and-done” activity. Second, the EU Member State Data Protection Authorities (DPAs), charged with enforcing GDPR compliance, are grappling with how best to approach the operational issues that arise as entities interpret and implement GDPR’s data protection principles. Third, we expect the issuance of additional guidance that will potentially impact a number of companies’ activities, including the interaction between GDPR and the not-yet-final EU ePrivacy Regulation for online data activities. As a result, we expect to see DPA interpretations of GDPR, including through enforcement activities, that will provide clearer compliance guidance.

Organizations that are beginning to or in the process of developing and implementing compliance programs should keep the following general principles in mind:

  • Don’t panic, but focus on high-risk priorities in the processing of personal data, which will depend on type of business operations, size of organization, territorial scope, etc.
  • GDPR compliance is a risk-based assessment rather than an exercise in complying with black and white rules. Because risk management must be tailored to the activities of each entity, reasonable GDPR compliance will vary from entity to entity. Avoid copying what another entity does with regard to GDPR or using a template approach to GDPR compliance.
  • Entities that are active in the online advertising, marketing, and communications space need to make sure that their risk management activities under GDPR maintain sufficient flexibility to account for the not-yet-released EU ePrivacy Regulation.
  • Successful completion of a GDPR compliance project requires:
    • Support of senior management as a top-level priority, who should be fully informed of potential risks of non-compliance and briefed regarding compliance efforts on an ongoing basis.
    • Involvement of legal, HR, finance, marketing, IT, and other key stakeholders in order to have a 360-degree view of the activities impacting the collection and processing of personal data.
    • A point person with overall responsibility for GDPR compliance, whether a formal data protection officer (DPO), to the extent required under GDPR, or another individual assigned enterprise-wide responsibility for data protection. 
  • GDPR compliance involves amending contracts, policies, and notices, but it is not a paper exercise. Most importantly, organizations should use GDPR compliance as the motivation to carefully assess all the ways in which personal data are handled and how the organization can adapt its existing processes and systems, and create awareness throughout the whole organization to change the approach towards personal data.

Crowell & Moring’s GDPR practice will continue to post alerts regarding key GDPR updates and guidance on our blog and conduct periodic webinars and live programs on GDPR implementation and enforcement developments. For more information, please see our GDPR overview.

Insights

Client Alert | 4 min read | 05.01.26

Federal Court Blocks Trump Administration Policies Restricting Wind and Solar Permitting

A coalition of regional clean energy trade associations — including RENEW Northeast, Alliance for Clean Energy New York, Southern Renewable Energy Association, and Interwest Energy Alliance — along with the Green Energy Consumers Alliance (GECA), filed suit in December 2025 against the Department of the Interior (DOI), the Bureau of Land Management, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), and the Army Corps of Engineers. The complaint alleged that five agency actions, issued in response to a series of executive orders and presidential memoranda beginning on January 20, 2025, violated the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) by arbitrarily halting or restricting federal permitting for wind and solar energy projects. Plaintiffs sought a preliminary injunction to halt enforcement of these policies while the litigation proceeds. See Renew Northeast, et al. v. U.S. Dep’t of Interior, et al., No. 25-cv-13961-DJC,  (D. Mass. Apr. 21, 2026) ECF Dkt. 89....