1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |For Iraq War Items Sole Source Award, COFC Grants Limited Injunctive Relief Despite OCI And CICA Violations

For Iraq War Items Sole Source Award, COFC Grants Limited Injunctive Relief Despite OCI And CICA Violations

Client Alert | 1 min read | 05.21.04

In Filtration Dev. Co. LLC v. U.S. (April 27, 2004), the Court of Federal Claims found (1) that a sole source award for filtration kits (to protect helicopters in Iraq from sand damage) that included a directed subcontract violated organizational conflict of interest (OCI) prohibitions because, even though it had performed no work on that system, the subcontractor held a Systems Engineering and Technical Assistance (SETA) contract for the system, and (2) that the urgent and compelling circumstances justification and approval (J&A) for the sole source action, despite explicitly authorizing procurement of a larger number of kits than already ordered by the prime from the designated subcontractor, was limited by the scope of the current emergency to the smaller order already placed. The court granted injunctive relief, but only to preclude further contracts or orders without a new J&A, and declined to enjoin the government from including the directed subcontractor in future competitions or contracting actions because, inter alia, the OCI could be waived.

Insights

Client Alert | 4 min read | 12.04.25

District Court Grants Preliminary Injunction Against Seller of Gray Market Snack Food Products

On November 12, 2025, Judge King in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington granted in part Haldiram India Ltd.’s (“Plaintiff” or “Haldiram”) motion for a preliminary injunction against Punjab Trading, Inc. (“Defendant” or “Punjab Trading”), a seller alleged to be importing and distributing gray market snack food products not authorized for sale in the United States. The court found that Haldiram was likely to succeed on the merits of its trademark infringement claim because the products at issue, which were intended for sale in India, were materially different from the versions intended for sale in the U.S., and for this reason were not genuine products when sold in the U.S. Although the court narrowed certain overbroad provisions in the requested order, it ultimately enjoined Punjab Trading from importing, selling, or assisting others in selling the non-genuine Haldiram products in the U.S. market....