1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |FERC Directs Mandatory Physical Security Standards

FERC Directs Mandatory Physical Security Standards

Client Alert | 1 min read | 03.14.14

On March 7, 2014, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) directed the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) to develop and file for approval reliability standards addressing threats and vulnerabilities to the physical security of critical facilities on the Bulk-Power System (BPS). The reliability standards must require owners or operators of BPS facilities ("registered entities") to take at least three steps to address risks posed by physical security attacks. 

First, registered entities must identify their BPS facilities that "if rendered inoperable or damaged, could have a critical impact on the operation of the interconnection through instability, uncontrolled separation or cascading failures on the Bulk-Power System." Second, registered entities that own or operate such critical facilities must evaluate potential physical threats and vulnerabilities to those facilities. Since potential threats and vulnerabilities will vary depending on the critical facility at issue, registered entities must tailor their evaluations to the unique characteristics of their critical facilities.  Third, registered entities must develop and implement a security plan based on this evaluation. 

NERC must file the proposed reliability standards by June 5, 2014. This very short time frame reflects the importance of having mandatory rules in place to address these physical security threats to BPS facilities. According to FERC, although many registered entities may already have taken voluntary steps to enhance their BPS facilities' physical security, the new reliability standards will require them to identify risks and have a plan that results in an adequate level of protection against the potential physical threats and vulnerabilities faced at their critical facilities. 

Given the short time frame for developing these standards and to avoid problems that could arise from standards developed in haste, registered entities should actively participate to ensure that (1) the standards for determining whether a given BPS facility is critical are not so broad as to include facilities that FERC might not have intended to be covered or that reasonably should not be covered by the new standards, and (2) the standards relating to the threat and vulnerability assessment and security plans are not inappropriately prescriptive.

Contacts

Insights

Client Alert | 3 min read | 06.12.26

DOJ Guidance Backs Away From Disparate Impact Liability

On June 9, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) issued a formal opinion concluding that the Equal Opportunity Employment Commission’s (EEOC) existing interpretations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) disparate-impact liability, including the Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures (UGESP), are unconstitutional. According to the opinion, EEOC’s prior interpretations contemplate liability based on disproportionately adverse effects alone, without regard to an employer’s likely intent, rather than treating disparate impact as an evidentiary mechanism to “smoke out” intentional discrimination. DOJ found that this approach functions as a “qualified racial-proportionality mandate” that places “a racial thumb on the scales, often requiring employers to evaluate the racial outcomes of their policies, and to make decisions based on (because of) those racial outcomes.” The opinion fulfills one mandate of Executive Order 14281, which rejected disparate-impact liability insofar as it “creates a near insurmountable presumption that unlawful discrimination exists wherever there are any differences in outcomes among different [demographic groups].”...

View All Insights