FEHBP Final Rule on Provider Sanctions
Client Alert | 1 min read | 03.08.04
The Office of Personnel Management ("OPM") has issued a final financial sanctions rule for health care providers participating in the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program ("FEHBP"). Two categories of financial sanctions are established by the March 3 rule: assessments, which are intended to recognize losses, costs, and damages incurred as the result of a provider's wrongful conduct, and civil monetary penalties, which are lump-sum amounts that, while computed by reference to improper claims, are intended principally to deter future violations. The bases for financial sanctions are (1) fraudulent or improper claims; (2) false or misleading statements in or about claims; and (3) failure to provide claims-related information that is required by law to be disclosed. Sanctions may be imposed only for violations that directly involve FEHBP enrollees, carriers, or funds. The final rule sets forth the procedures for imposing, determining the amount, and collecting financial sanctions, as well as providers' right to contest and appeal the imposition of financial sanctions. The March 3 final rule also clarifies the circumstances under which payments may be made from FEHBP funds to suspended providers. This rule, along with the rule governing suspension and debarment of FEHBP providers, implements the administrative sanctions enacted by the Federal Employees Health Care Protection Act of 1998 (Pub. L. 105-266).
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 08.03.26
On July 20, 2026, New Jersey Governor Mikie Sherrill signed the Forbidding the Algorithmic Inflation of Rent (FAIR) Act into law, making New Jersey the fourth state to regulate algorithmic rent-setting practices. Three days later, on July 23, 2026, Governor Sherrill signed the Fair Price Protection Act, which targets “surveillance pricing”—the practice of using or collecting personal data about a user and using an algorithm or artificial intelligence to charge different consumers different prices for the same products. Together, these laws represent a significant expansion of New Jersey's consumer protection framework in the algorithmic pricing context.
Client Alert | 2 min read | 08.03.26
New York Becomes First State to Restrict Addictive Social Media Features for Minors
Client Alert | 4 min read | 08.03.26
Client Alert | 6 min read | 08.03.26
The Pipe, Not the Posts: How Section 230’s Protections Extend to Generative AI Platforms
