1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |FEHBP Final Rule on Provider Sanctions

FEHBP Final Rule on Provider Sanctions

Client Alert | 1 min read | 03.08.04

The Office of Personnel Management ("OPM") has issued a final financial sanctions rule for health care providers participating in the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program ("FEHBP"). Two categories of financial sanctions are established by the March 3 rule: assessments, which are intended to recognize losses, costs, and damages incurred as the result of a provider's wrongful conduct, and civil monetary penalties, which are lump-sum amounts that, while computed by reference to improper claims, are intended principally to deter future violations. The bases for financial sanctions are (1) fraudulent or improper claims; (2) false or misleading statements in or about claims; and (3) failure to provide claims-related information that is required by law to be disclosed. Sanctions may be imposed only for violations that directly involve FEHBP enrollees, carriers, or funds. The final rule sets forth the procedures for imposing, determining the amount, and collecting financial sanctions, as well as providers' right to contest and appeal the imposition of financial sanctions. The March 3 final rule also clarifies the circumstances under which payments may be made from FEHBP funds to suspended providers. This rule, along with the rule governing suspension and debarment of FEHBP providers, implements the administrative sanctions enacted by the Federal Employees Health Care Protection Act of 1998 (Pub. L. 105-266).

Insights

Client Alert | 2 min read | 03.23.26

ACTS Survey Compliance Deadline Temporarily Extended: What Higher Education Institutions Need to Know

On March 13, a Massachusetts federal district court temporarily blocked the Trump Administration from requiring higher education institutions to respond to the Admissions and Consumer Transparency Supplement (“ACTS”) survey — a new data collection effort mandating that institutions disclose detailed admissions information regarding students’ race and sex to the federal government. In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Department of Education, 1:26-cv-11229 (D. Mass.), the court extended the deadline for institutions to respond to the survey from March 18th to March 25th to allow time to consider the case....