Federal Trade Commission Votes to Conduct Study on Patent Assertion Entities
Client Alert | 2 min read | 09.27.13
The FTC announced on September 27 that after a unanimous vote, the Commissioners have decided to launch a study of patent assertion entities (PAEs) and their effect on innovation and competition. The agency has long indicated interest in this issue. The study, which will be conducted pursuant to Section 6(b) of the FTC Act, will allow the FTC to issue compulsory process orders to gather information from PAEs, as well as from other companies that operate in the wireless communications sector.
PAEs have lately garnered scrutiny from the Obama Administration, Congress, and private litigants, as described in more depth here. Their effect on competition and innovation is, however, difficult to measure, because details about licensing transactions are often confidential. But the Commission has the authority to collect non-public information, such as licensing agreements and cost and revenue data. As a result, the study is expected to generate a much richer set of data from which the Commission will be able to draw conclusions. According to the Commission's announcement, the study will target specific issues, including (1) the corporate structure of PAEs; (2) the type of patents held by PAEs; (3) the licensing and litigation conduct of PAEs; and (4) the operating costs and revenues of PAEs.
While the Commission has emphasized on various occasions that it has not yet drawn any conclusions about whether PAEs have a negative effect on competition and innovation, a 6(b) study has the potential to result in enforcement actions in the future. For example, the Commission's position against reverse payment settlements in the pharmaceutical industry was solidified after it conducted a 6(b) study on that subject from 2000 through 2002.
The FTC has issued a public call for comments on proposed information requests to PAEs, and it will accept such comments for 60 days, at this address. Upon expiration of the comment period, the FTC will seek clearance from the Office of Management and Budget to commence issuing compulsory process orders.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.21.25
On November 7, 2025, in Thornton v. National Academy of Sciences, No. 25-cv-2155, 2025 WL 3123732 (D.D.C. Nov. 7, 2025), the District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed a False Claims Act (FCA) retaliation complaint on the basis that the plaintiff’s allegations that he was fired after blowing the whistle on purported illegally discriminatory use of federal funding was not sufficient to support his FCA claim. This case appears to be one of the first filed, and subsequently dismissed, following Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche’s announcement of the creation of the Civil Rights Fraud Initiative on May 19, 2025, which “strongly encourages” private individuals to file lawsuits under the FCA relating to purportedly discriminatory and illegal use of federal funding for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in violation of Executive Order 14173, Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity (Jan. 21, 2025). In this case, the court dismissed the FCA retaliation claim and rejected the argument that an organization could violate the FCA merely by “engaging in discriminatory conduct while conducting a federally funded study.” The analysis in Thornton could be a sign of how forthcoming arguments of retaliation based on reporting allegedly fraudulent DEI activity will be analyzed in the future.
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.20.25
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.20.25
Client Alert | 6 min read | 11.19.25
