Federal Court Grant of Motion for Summary Judgment to Employer Emphasizes Importance of Prompt Remedial Action in Response to Harassment Complaints
Client Alert | 2 min read | 12.18.09
A recent case before the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland emphasizes the importance of employers' prompt remedial actions in addressing complaints of co-worker harassment.
In EEOC v. Xerxes Corporation, 2009 WL 4348589, No. 08-1882 (D. Md. Nov. 30, 2009), the EEOC filed suit on behalf of three employees who asserted that they were the targets of racial slurs and racially derogatory comments, pranks and practical jokes, and threatening notes from their co-workers. When they reported these incidents to Xerxes, the company conducted investigations, took disciplinary action against the alleged harassers, and thereafter conducted company-wide training on its anti-harassment policies and complaint procedures. Xerxes also reported the threatening notes to local law enforcement. The court found these steps sufficient to excuse Xerxes from liability and granted Xerxes' motion for summary judgment on multiple claims of co-worker racial harassment.
To avoid liability for racial harassment by one employee against another co-worker, employers must have reasonable procedures in place to receive complaints and must respond to such complaints with remedial action reasonably calculated to end the harassment. In this case, the court noted that "[w]henever Xerxes learned of harassment, it acted quickly and reasonably effectively to end it." With regard to several instances of alleged discrimination that were not reported, the court commented that "[i]nstances where Xerxes was unaware of the harassment were not caused by willful ignorance, but by the complainants' failure to notify Xerxes' management."
While EEOC v. Xerxes Corp. does not pave new ground, it serves as an important reminder to employers of the importance of a prompt and effective response to any harassment, retaliation, or discrimination complaint. Employers should ensure they have effective reporting procedures, should take proactive steps to ensure that all employees understand the anti-harassment policy and the complaint process, should promptly investigate all harassment claims, and, where there is a finding that harassment has occurred, should take action sufficient to stop the harassing conduct.
If you have any questions concerning this case or best practices in this area, please contact the attorneys listed to the left or your regular Crowell & Moring contact.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 6 min read | 11.03.25
ICE Is Suddenly At The Door: How Retailers, Hospitals, And Hotels Can Survive The Surprise Visitor
Imagine a typical morning at your retail store, hospital, or hotel—customers are arriving, staff are busy, and suddenly, federal agents from ICE appear at your front desk. The surprise is real, but panic does not have to be. Unannounced inspections conducted by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) inspectors have been occurring for years, but in recent months, ICE has ramped up inspection visits across the service sector, targeting I-9 compliance and employment records. These visits are not always dramatic raids; more often, they are routine checks that can escalate if your team is not prepared.
Client Alert | 6 min read | 11.03.25
Client Alert | 13 min read | 10.30.25
Federal and State Regulators Target AI Chatbots and Intimate Imagery
Client Alert | 3 min read | 10.30.25
Is Course Hero Heading to Summer School After Summary Judgment Loss?

