Federal Circuit Clarifies Prejudice Review In Bid Protest Cases
Client Alert | less than 1 min read | 04.26.05
Explaining away seemingly contradictory precedent, the Federal Circuit in Bannum, Inc. v. U.S. (Apr. 21, 2005) clarified that, while the merits are reviewed on appeal de novo under the Administrative Procedure Act's "arbitrary and capricious or in violation of law" standard, the determination of whether a violation of law is prejudicial requires fact finding by the Court of Federal Claims and is reviewed for "clear error." Applying the clear error standard to this case, the appellate court found none in the trial court's determination that the violation had not prejudiced the protester.
Insights
Client Alert | 5 min read | 10.22.25
Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Privilege Protections During Internal Investigations
On October 3, 2025, the Sixth Circuit reaffirmed that the attorney-client privilege and the work-product doctrine protections apply to materials created during attorney-led internal investigations. In re FirstEnergy Corp., No. 24-3654 (6th Cir. Oct. 3, 2025).
Client Alert | 4 min read | 10.21.25
Pivot Point for 340B: HRSA Rebate Model Pilot Program Approaches Launch
Client Alert | 5 min read | 10.20.25
What’s new for Belgian Construction Contracts under the New Book 7 of the Civil Code
Client Alert | 3 min read | 10.17.25
California Enacts New Requirements and Restrictions for Health Care Transactions
