1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |FDA Publishes SPL Guide for MoCRA Facility Registration and Product Listings

FDA Publishes SPL Guide for MoCRA Facility Registration and Product Listings

Client Alert | 1 min read | 11.01.23

On October 13, 2023 he FDA announced that two of the requirements set forth in the Modernization of Cosmetics Regulation Act of 2022 (MoCRA)— facility registration and product listing—will be included as part of the Structured Product Labeling (SPL) framework. SPL is a document formatting standard adopted by FDA for exchanging product-related information. 

The FDA previously developed Cosmetics Direct, a draft electronic portal for submissions under MoCRA. Companies who will use Cosmetics Direct may submit facility registration information and/or product listings by importing an SPL document, which contains user friendly data entry forms, performs initial validation, creates and saves the SPL submission, and submits the SPL document to FDA for internal processing.

In order to assist those who will be using and uploading SPL documents, the FDA also published a SPL Implementation Guide with technical conformance criteria for SPL documents. According to this Guide, importing an existing SPL document will be useful for bulk submissions, and users will be able to copy a successfully uploaded SPL document as a starting point for their own submission.

Contacts

Insights

Client Alert | 5 min read | 12.12.25

Eleventh Circuit Hears Argument on False Claims Act Qui Tam Constitutionality

On the morning of December 12, 2025, the Eleventh Circuit heard argument in United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, LLC, et al., No. 24-13581 (11th Cir. 2025). This case concerns the constitutionality of the False Claims Act (FCA) qui tam provisions and a groundbreaking September 2024 opinion in which the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida held that the FCA’s qui tam provisions were unconstitutional under Article II. See United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Fla. Med. Assocs., LLC, 751 F. Supp. 3d 1293 (M.D. Fla. 2024). That decision, penned by District Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle, was the first success story for a legal theory that has been gaining steam ever since Justices Thomas, Barrett, and Kavanaugh indicated they would be willing to consider arguments about the constitutionality of the qui tam provisions in U.S. ex rel. Polansky v. Exec. Health Res., 599 U.S. 419 (2023). In her opinion, Judge Mizelle held (1) qui tam relators are officers of the U.S. who must be appointed under the Appointments Clause; and (2) historical practice treating qui tam and similar relators as less than “officers” for constitutional purposes was not enough to save the qui tam provisions from the fundamental Article II infirmity the court identified. That ruling was appealed and, after full briefing, including by the government and a bevy of amici, the litigants stepped up to the plate this morning for oral argument....

View All Insights