FDA Plans to Resume Domestic Facility Inspections
Client Alert | 1 min read | 07.17.20
In March, 2020, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) announced that the Agency would temporarily halt domestic facility inspections not deemed “mission-critical,” citing health concerns related to the COVID-19 pandemic. On July 10th, FDA announced its plans to resume domestic on-site facility inspections during the week of July 20th.
With the re-start of on-site inspections, the Agency is following both White House Guidelines and CDC guidance to optimize its operations and ensure employee safety. FDA is employing a new COVID-19 rating system, called the “COVID-19 Advisory Level,” to evaluate “when and where it is safest to conduct prioritized domestic inspections.” This rating system evaluates the number of COVID-19 cases in a particular area using state and national data. A locality’s COVID-19 Advisory Level is based on the phase of the particular state, as defined by White House guidelines, as well as statistics on infection trends and intensity, evaluated at the county level.
Depending upon a particular county’s COVID-19 Advisory Level, the Agency intends to take one of three actions: (1) pursue mission critical inspections only; (2) perform inspections, with precautions in place to protect vulnerable staff members; or (3) resume normal regulatory activities.
FDA also announced that for the foreseeable future, on-site inspections (other than retail tobacco inspections) will be pre-announced to FDA-regulated businesses. According to FDA, this will promote the safety of both the FDA investigator and the company’s employees, and give companies a “heads up” to ensure that employees essential to the inspection are present when the investigator arrives. FDA investigators will be equipped with personal protective equipment to ensure inspections resume as safely as possible.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 4 min read | 12.04.25
District Court Grants Preliminary Injunction Against Seller of Gray Market Snack Food Products
On November 12, 2025, Judge King in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington granted in part Haldiram India Ltd.’s (“Plaintiff” or “Haldiram”) motion for a preliminary injunction against Punjab Trading, Inc. (“Defendant” or “Punjab Trading”), a seller alleged to be importing and distributing gray market snack food products not authorized for sale in the United States. The court found that Haldiram was likely to succeed on the merits of its trademark infringement claim because the products at issue, which were intended for sale in India, were materially different from the versions intended for sale in the U.S., and for this reason were not genuine products when sold in the U.S. Although the court narrowed certain overbroad provisions in the requested order, it ultimately enjoined Punjab Trading from importing, selling, or assisting others in selling the non-genuine Haldiram products in the U.S. market.
Client Alert | 21 min read | 12.04.25
Highlights: CMS’s Proposed Rule for Medicare Part C & D (CY 2027 NPRM)
Client Alert | 11 min read | 12.01.25

