FCC Reverses Precedent, Rules that Government Contractors Are Subject to the TCPA
Client Alert | 1 min read | 12.21.20
In a ruling issued last week, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) overturned precedent from 2016, ruling that federal, state, and local government contractors are subject to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) and therefore cannot make TCPA-prohibited robocalls on behalf of the government.
The TCPA restricts certain calls made by “any person.” In a 2016 ruling, the FCC declared that the term “person” does not include the federal government and that therefore the TCPA’s restrictions do not apply to calls made by the federal government. The FCC extended this interpretation to cover calls made by contractors acting as agents of the federal government in accordance with the federal common law of agency.
On reconsideration, the FCC has now reversed its 2016 ruling, ruling that:
- A federal government contractor making calls on behalf of the government is a “person” subject to the TCPA;
- A state government caller making calls in the conduct of official government business is not a “person” subject to the TCPA;
- A state or local government contractor, like a federal government contractor, is a “person” and is therefore subject to the TCPA; and
- A local government, unlike a federal or state government, is a “person” subject to the TCPA.
Given that the TCPA is fertile ground for litigants and plaintiffs’ attorneys due to the potential damages of $500 to $1,500 per violation, government contractors should review their calling practices to analyze the impact of this recent FCC ruling.
Contacts

Partner, Crowell Global Advisors Senior Director
- Washington, D.C.
- D | +1.202.624.2698
- Washington, D.C. (CGA)
- D | +1 202.624.2500
Insights
Client Alert | 7 min read | 12.17.25
After hosting a series of workshops and issuing multiple rounds of materials, including enforcement notices, checklists, templates, and other guidance, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) has proposed regulations to implement the Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act (SB 253) and the Climate-Related Financial Risk Act (SB 261) (both as amended by SB 219), which require large U.S.-based businesses operating in California to disclose greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and climate-related risks. CARB also published a Notice of Public Hearing and an Initial Statement of Reasons along with the proposed regulations. While CARB’s final rules were statutorily required to be promulgated by July 1, 2025, these are still just proposals. CARB’s proposed rules largely track earlier guidance regarding how CARB intends to define compliance obligations, exemptions, and key deadlines, and establish fee programs to fund regulatory operations.
Client Alert | 1 min read | 12.17.25
Client Alert | 7 min read | 12.17.25
Executive Order Tries to Thwart “Onerous” AI State Regulation, Calls for National Framework
Client Alert | 4 min read | 12.17.25
The new EU Bioeconomy Strategy: a regulatory framework in transition


