1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |False Claim Need Not Be "Presented" By Defendant

False Claim Need Not Be "Presented" By Defendant

Client Alert | 1 min read | 12.20.05

In the latest in a series of cases interpreting the False Claims Act's "presentment" element, the court in U.S. v. Sequel Contractors, Inc., 2005 WL 3307026 (C.D. Cal., Nov. 14, 2005), held that a contractor submitting a false claim for payment to its county-government customer, which then submitted a request for partial reimbursement to the federal government, could be liable under the FCA, because the statute only requires that someone (in this case the county-government customer), and not necessarily the defendant itself, "present" the false claim to the federal government, as long as the defendant "causes" the ultimate presentation. The court also held that, although actionable false claims must be made "knowingly," the knowledge in question is knowledge of the claim's falsity, not knowledge that the ultimate recipient of the claim would be the federal government.

Insights

Client Alert | 5 min read | 07.25.25

The Changing Face of UK Defence and Security

On 2 June 2025, the UK Government unveiled its 2025 Strategic Defence Review titled the “Plan for Change for Defence” (the “2025 SDR”), heralding it as the dawn of a new era in British defence and security. Hailed as a landmark by the Prime Minister, the 2025 SDR underscores the urgent need to address daily cyber threats and embrace the rapid evolution of technology that is reshaping the battlefield. It also emphasises both the necessity of and the opportunities that this approach affords to create a new partnership with industry and radically reform procurement, leading to the creation of a “defence dividend” of jobs, wealth and opportunity throughout the UK....