Export Controls: State Offers Salve to Longstanding Irritant for Dual and Third Country Nationals
Client Alert | 1 min read | 08.11.10
Today, the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls published a proposed rule (75 Fed. Reg. 48625 (Aug. 11, 2010)) that would soften considerably the longstanding policy of requiring authorized foreign recipients of ITAR controlled technical data (or defense articles) to obtain express authorization for its employees who are dual or third country nationals to have access to the controlled information. State recognizes its prior policy implicates human rights issues and has caused significant concern for companies (and governments) of major allies such as Canada and the United Kingdom where employment laws strictly limit use of citizenship and nationality data.
The proposed rule, if adopted in its current form, would not signal a complete retreat. It would cover only those bona fide, regular employees of the foreign end user or consignee, and only those located in the same physical territory as the end user is located or the consignee operates. Furthermore, the proposed rule would require that the end user or consignee have in place screening systems designed to ensure that its employees agree not to retransfer any of the information received except as authorized and that they do not have regular or substantive contact with proscribed countries listed in § 126.1. This latter requirement which must be documented in a technology security/clearance plan may prove to be burdensome but significantly less offensive to our allies than the prior policy.
Interested parties have until September 10, 2010 to submit comments on the proposed rule.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 7 min read | 10.29.26
On 8 October 2026, Crowell & Moring, King's College London, and the Competition Law Center at George Washington University co-hosted the 7th EU Competition Law Conference at De Warande in Brussels. Mark Meador, Commissioner at the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC), delivered the opening keynote address, followed by four panels bringing together practitioners, regulators, academics, and in-house counsel to discuss the latest developments in EU, UK, and US competition law enforcement. Among other things, the panels examined algorithmic pricing; the European Commission's (Commission) new guidelines on exclusionary abuses under Article 102 TFEU (Article 102 Guidelines); the impact of dominant positions in merger reviews; and lessons from the enforcement of the Digital Markets Act (DMA) and the UK’s Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act.
Client Alert | 3 min read | 10.29.26
What University Licensors Should Learn From TexasLDPC v. Broadcom
Client Alert | 2 min read | 10.28.26
Debriefing to Dead Briefing: How to Avoid Dismissal by Identifying “Required” Debriefings
Client Alert | 7 min read | 10.27.26

