Executive Order Formally Establishes U.S. DOGE Service with IT Modernization Initiative
Client Alert | 1 min read | 01.24.25
Among the flurry of executive actions taken during his first day in office, President Trump formally established the U.S. Department of Government Efficiency Service (DOGE) via executive order (EO) on January 20, 2025, reconstituting the formerly named U.S. Digital Service that was created in 2014 by President Obama within the Office of Management and Budget.
Deviating from initial announcements that DOGE would operate as an external advisory body staffed by volunteers, the newly created DOGE has been designated as a “temporary organization” within the Executive Office of the President, scheduled to sunset on July 4, 2026, with an Administrator reporting directly into the White House. Within 30 days, each federal agency is also directed to establish a “DOGE Team” with at least four employees to carry out the administration’s DOGE agenda—one team lead, one engineer, one human resources specialist, and one attorney—who will receive “prompt and full access” to all unclassified agency records, software, and IT systems.
The EO notably avoids reference to any government-wide cost-cutting measures, but rather focuses DOGE’s mandate on a Software Modernization Initiative that seeks to improve the quality and efficiency of government-wide software and IT systems, and to promote the interoperability between agency networks, ensure data integrity, and facilitate responsible data collection and synchronization. Given the embedding of DOGE officials within each agency and the unfettered access they will have to IT and spending data, however, we anticipate ample opportunity for DOGE to identify and make cost saving recommendations to administration officials and lawmakers. In the meantime, government contractors supporting federal IT systems and networks should brace for the establishment of formal DOGE Teams at each agency, and an enhanced push toward the modernization of information technology and infrastructure.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 6 min read | 11.26.25
From ‘Second’ to ‘First:’ Federal Circuit Tackles Obvious Claim Errors
Patent claims must be clear and definite, as they set the boundaries of the patentee’s rights. Occasionally, however, claim language contains errors, such as typographical mistakes or incorrect numbering. Courts possess very limited authority to correct such errors. The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has emphasized that judicial correction is appropriate only in rare circumstances, where (1) the error is evident from the face of the patent, and (2) the proposed correction is the sole reasonable interpretation in view of the claim language, specification, and prosecution history. See Group One, Ltd. v. Hallmark Cards, Inc., 407 F.3d 1297, 1303 (Fed. Cir. 2005) and Novo Indus., L.P. v. Micro Molds Corp., 350 F.3d 1348, 1357 (Fed. Cir. 2003).
Client Alert | 5 min read | 11.26.25
Client Alert | 6 min read | 11.25.25
Brussels Court Clarifies the EU’s SPC Manufacturing Waiver Regulation Rules
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.24.25
