European Commission Revises Guidelines for Setting Fines in Antitrust Cases
Client Alert | 2 min read | 06.28.06
On June 28, 2006, the European Commission has adopted new guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed on companies for infringements of Articles 81 and 82. The new guidelines represent a substantial change in the Commission’s fine setting procedure. They are expected to lead to higher fines for cartels of a long duration and should have a significant impact on repeat offenders.
Following the entry into force of the new guidelines, fines will be based on a percentage of the yearly sales in the relevant sector for each company participating in the infringement. The Commission will be able to impose fines representing up to 30% of such sales (not limited to the EEA). In order to fully reflect the duration of the infringement, this amount will be multiplied by the number of years of participation in the infringement.
This constitutes a major step away from the current 1998 guidelines, under which the base fine is a lump sum which varies depending on the gravity of the infringement and is increased 10% per year of infringement. This lump-sum system has been under constant criticism for violating the principle of proportionality and being discriminatory to smaller companies. The Commission’s new combination of the value of sales to which the infringement relates and the duration of the infringement is intended to provide a more appropriate reflection of the economic importance of the infringement as well as the relative weight of each participant.
The new guidelines will furthermore introduce a mechanism of a so-called “entry fee”. According to this mechanism, the simple fact that a company enters into a cartel will cost the company 15 to 25% of the yearly relevant sales, whatever the duration of the infringement.
Finally, the new guidelines foresee a significant increase in the level of fines for repeat offenders. Up to now, the Commission’s practice was to increase a fine by 50% where the undertaking had been previously involved in one or more similar infringements. The new guidelines change this approach in three ways: (i) the Commission will take into account not only its own previous decisions, but also those decisions by national competition authorities applying EC competition law, (ii) the increase may be up to 100%, and (iii) each prior infringement will justify an increase of the fine.
The new guidelines will apply to every anti-trust fine decision for which a Statement of Objections is notified to the parties after their publication in the Official Journal (probably within the next two months). The text of the new guidelines is available in English, French and German on the website of DG Competition.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 06.03.26
Important EU Court Judgment Clarifies Rules on Interest Due in Cartel Damages Cases
In a judgment that will have direct and immediate consequences, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has clarified that for all competition damages actions brought after 26 December 2014, interest runs from the date on which the harm occurred. The ruling addressed two important questions: (1) whether national provisions implementing Article 3(2) of the EU Damages Directive — which requires interest to run from the date harm occurred —apply to cases in which the harm preceded the adoption of those provisions; and (2) how the date of harm should be determined in cartel cases involving the purchase of goods at inflated prices.
Client Alert | 2 min read | 06.02.26
SBA OHA Confirms That the Submission Date for a Proposal with Pricing Controls Size Determination
Client Alert | 5 min read | 06.01.26
California Court Upholds Insurer’s Duty to Defend After Covered Claim Is Dismissed
Client Alert | 2 min read | 05.29.26
California Assembly Passes AB 1776, Sending Major Antitrust Bill to the Senate

