European Commission Introduces New Settlement Procedure for Cartel Cases
Client Alert | 2 min read | 06.30.08
The European Commission today introduced a new settlement procedure for cartel cases, under which the parties that acknowledge their participation in a cartel may obtain a 10% reduction in fines. This procedure is intended to simplify the Commission’s administrative processes, freeing up resources so that it can pursue new cases. It may also reduce the number of appeals to the European Courts in cartel cases.
Parties do not automatically have a right to settlement under the new process, and the Commission will have full discretion to determine whether a case is suitable for settlement. Nor will the Commission negotiate the use of evidence or the appropriate sanction. The Commission will inform the parties of its case and the supporting evidence. Parties will then have to indicate whether they wish to pursue a settlement. In order to settle, parties will have to acknowledge the scope and duration of the cartel as well as the liability of the individual companies involved in a so-called ”settlement submission.” If the Commission chooses to accept the parties’ settlement submissions, it will do so under an abbreviated procedure resulting in a shorter than usual decision. Moreover, until a decision is taken, the Commission will retain the possibility to reject the proposed settlement and revert to its normal process.
In contrast with US practice of plea bargaining, the Commission sees settlement as a tool for achieving procedural savings rather than for evidence gathering. Its main evidence gathering tool in cartel cases will remain its leniency program under the 2006 Leniency Notice. Fine reductions under the new settlement process and the leniency program will be cumulative.
Although the Commission has yet to release full details of the new procedure, it appears to be closely based on its package of proposals launched on October 26, 2007. That package has been widely criticized by lawyers in private practice for failing to offer companies sufficient incentives to make settlement attractive. See e.g. http://www.crowell.com/documents/All-Settled_Where-Are-The-European-Commissions-Settlement-Proposals-Post-Consultation.pdf
The settlement procedure will enter into force on the day of its publication in the EU Official Journal.
For further information:
http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/cartels/legislation/settlements.html
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 08.03.26
On July 20, 2026, New Jersey Governor Mikie Sherrill signed the Forbidding the Algorithmic Inflation of Rent (FAIR) Act into law, making New Jersey the fourth state to regulate algorithmic rent-setting practices. Three days later, on July 23, 2026, Governor Sherrill signed the Fair Price Protection Act, which targets “surveillance pricing”—the practice of using or collecting personal data about a user and using an algorithm or artificial intelligence to charge different consumers different prices for the same products. Together, these laws represent a significant expansion of New Jersey's consumer protection framework in the algorithmic pricing context.
Client Alert | 2 min read | 08.03.26
New York Becomes First State to Restrict Addictive Social Media Features for Minors
Client Alert | 4 min read | 08.03.26
Client Alert | 6 min read | 08.03.26
The Pipe, Not the Posts: How Section 230’s Protections Extend to Generative AI Platforms
