European Commission Introduces New Settlement Procedure for Cartel Cases
Client Alert | 2 min read | 06.30.08
The European Commission today introduced a new settlement procedure for cartel cases, under which the parties that acknowledge their participation in a cartel may obtain a 10% reduction in fines. This procedure is intended to simplify the Commission’s administrative processes, freeing up resources so that it can pursue new cases. It may also reduce the number of appeals to the European Courts in cartel cases.
Parties do not automatically have a right to settlement under the new process, and the Commission will have full discretion to determine whether a case is suitable for settlement. Nor will the Commission negotiate the use of evidence or the appropriate sanction. The Commission will inform the parties of its case and the supporting evidence. Parties will then have to indicate whether they wish to pursue a settlement. In order to settle, parties will have to acknowledge the scope and duration of the cartel as well as the liability of the individual companies involved in a so-called ”settlement submission.” If the Commission chooses to accept the parties’ settlement submissions, it will do so under an abbreviated procedure resulting in a shorter than usual decision. Moreover, until a decision is taken, the Commission will retain the possibility to reject the proposed settlement and revert to its normal process.
In contrast with US practice of plea bargaining, the Commission sees settlement as a tool for achieving procedural savings rather than for evidence gathering. Its main evidence gathering tool in cartel cases will remain its leniency program under the 2006 Leniency Notice. Fine reductions under the new settlement process and the leniency program will be cumulative.
Although the Commission has yet to release full details of the new procedure, it appears to be closely based on its package of proposals launched on October 26, 2007. That package has been widely criticized by lawyers in private practice for failing to offer companies sufficient incentives to make settlement attractive. See e.g. http://www.crowell.com/documents/All-Settled_Where-Are-The-European-Commissions-Settlement-Proposals-Post-Consultation.pdf
The settlement procedure will enter into force on the day of its publication in the EU Official Journal.
For further information:
http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/cartels/legislation/settlements.html
Insights
Client Alert | 5 min read | 12.12.25
Eleventh Circuit Hears Argument on False Claims Act Qui Tam Constitutionality
On the morning of December 12, 2025, the Eleventh Circuit heard argument in United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, LLC, et al., No. 24-13581 (11th Cir. 2025). This case concerns the constitutionality of the False Claims Act (FCA) qui tam provisions and a groundbreaking September 2024 opinion in which the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida held that the FCA’s qui tam provisions were unconstitutional under Article II. See United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Fla. Med. Assocs., LLC, 751 F. Supp. 3d 1293 (M.D. Fla. 2024). That decision, penned by District Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle, was the first success story for a legal theory that has been gaining steam ever since Justices Thomas, Barrett, and Kavanaugh indicated they would be willing to consider arguments about the constitutionality of the qui tam provisions in U.S. ex rel. Polansky v. Exec. Health Res., 599 U.S. 419 (2023). In her opinion, Judge Mizelle held (1) qui tam relators are officers of the U.S. who must be appointed under the Appointments Clause; and (2) historical practice treating qui tam and similar relators as less than “officers” for constitutional purposes was not enough to save the qui tam provisions from the fundamental Article II infirmity the court identified. That ruling was appealed and, after full briefing, including by the government and a bevy of amici, the litigants stepped up to the plate this morning for oral argument.
Client Alert | 8 min read | 12.11.25
Director Squires Revamps the Workings of the U.S. Patent Office
Client Alert | 8 min read | 12.10.25
Creativity You Can Use: CJEU Clarifies Copyright for Applied Art
Client Alert | 4 min read | 12.10.25
Federal Court Strikes Down Interior Order Suspending Wind Energy Development
