European Commission Adopts New Antitrust Guidelines On Cooperation Between Competitors
Client Alert | 2 min read | 12.14.10
Today, December 14, 2010, the European Commission has adopted revised guidelines on the treatment of cooperation between competitors under EU antitrust rules. The main changes from previous Commission guidance concern standardization, information exchange and the treatment of joint ventures. The guidelines also cover joint R&D, production, distribution and purchasing.
The Commission also adopted new versions of two less frequently used block exemption (safe harbor) regulations: the R&D and joint production and specialization block exemptions.
Standardization
The Commission has substantially revised its guidance on standard-setting agreements, both from its previous guidelines and from the version of these guidelines that was put out to consultation in May 2010.
The guidance now sets out 'safe harbor' criteria for standard-setting agreements including (i) open participation for all relevant competitors (ii) transparency so that stakeholders can inform themselves on upcoming, on-going and finalized work and (iii) a balanced IPR policy with good faith disclosure of essential IP and a requirement that holders of essential IP irrevocably commit to licensing on FRAND (fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory) conditions.
The guidance also advocates ex ante disclosure of maximum licensing terms as a way to avoid disputes regarding the maximum FRAND fee and suggests methods for assessing the level of FRAND.
Information Exchange
The guidelines include a completely new chapter on information exchange. This represents the first comprehensive guidance from the Commission in relation to this issue. The guidance highlights, in particular, exchanges between competitors of individualized information on intended future prices or quantities as being, in effect, per se (so-called 'object') infringements.
Joint Ventures
The draft guidelines issued for consultation in May had included language indicating that agreements between joint ventures and their parent companies fell outside the scope of EU rules on anti-competitive agreements. Reports suggested that this language was highly controversial within the European Commission and it does not appear in the final version adopted today. However, the final guidelines still state that agreements between a company and a subsidiary over which it exercises "decisive influence" will not be considered an agreement between competitors and may fall outside EU rules. This language is broad enough to cover agreements between parent companies and at least some joint ventures.
The R&D block exemption
The scope of the R&D block exemption has been considerably extended. It now covers so-called 'paid-for research' agreements, where one party finances R&D carried out by another, as well as joint R&D. It also allows parties more scope to jointly exploit R&D results.
For more information, please contact the professionals listed below or your regular Crowell & Moring contacts.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 2 min read | 03.27.26
CMS Releases PY 2020 RADV Audit Methods and Instructions: Key Takeaways for Health Plans
On March 20, 2026, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released new guidance outlining the agency’s audit methods and instructions for Medicare Advantage (MA) plans subject to upcoming risk adjustment data validation (RADV) audits for payment year (PY) 2020. In addition to providing necessary context for MA plans selected for auditing, this resource clarifies CMS’s methodological and procedural expectations. While the high-level takeaways are recapped below for convenience, we strongly recommend that MA organizations selected for PY 2020 audits closely review the guidance to understand what may be involved — or required — during the agency’s review.
Client Alert | 4 min read | 03.25.26
NAIC Intensifies AI Regulatory Focus: What Health Insurance Payors Need to Know
Client Alert | 11 min read | 03.25.26
White House National AI Policy Framework Calls for Preempting State Laws, Protecting Children
Client Alert | 3 min read | 03.24.26
California Considering A Massive Expansion of Its Antitrust Laws

