1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |EU Regulatory Update: REACH Deadline fast approaching for notifying the European Chemicals Agency about the presence of 20 Candidate List substances in articles

EU Regulatory Update: REACH Deadline fast approaching for notifying the European Chemicals Agency about the presence of 20 Candidate List substances in articles

Client Alert | 2 min read | 06.13.12

Under the EU REACH legislation, EU producers and importers have only until 19 June 2012 to notify the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) about the presence in certain of their products of 20 substances of very high concern. These substances are: 4-(1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl)phenol, N,N-dimethylacetamide, Phenolphthalein, Lead diazide - Lead azide, Lead dipicrate, Calcium arsenate, 1,2-dichloroethane, Dichromium tris(chromate), 2-Methoxyaniline - o-Anisidine, Pentazinc chromate octahydroxide, Aluminosilicate Refractory Ceramic Fibres, Arsenic acid, Potassium hydroxyoctaoxodizincatedichromate, Formaldehyde - oligomeric reaction products with aniline, Lead styphnate, Trilead diarsenate, Bis(2-methoxyethyl) phthalate, Zirconia Aluminosilicate Refractory Ceramic Fibres, Bis(2-methoxyethyl) ether, and 2,2'-dichloro-4,4'-methylenedianiline.

Under REACH, certain substances that may have serious and often irreversible effects on human health and the environment can be included on the Candidate List of Substances of Very High Concern (SVHCs) and their use may subsequently be made subject to an Authorisation decision of the European Commission.

The 20 substances listed above were added to the REACH Candidate List in December 2011, and consequently a six-month deadline to make a required notification to ECHA about their presence in certain of a company's products will expire on 19 June 2012. Companies which start to manufacture or import into the EU substances on the Candidate List after this notification deadline has expired should make the notification without undue delay as soon as these conditions related to the notification obligation are met.

Producers and importers in the EU are required under REACH to notify ECHA of the substances listed on the Candidate List present in their products under the following conditions:

  • the products in question qualify as an "article" for purposes of REACH;
  • one of the SVHC substances is present in those products above a concentration of 0.1% weight by weight; and
  • the substance is present in those products in quantities totalling over one tonne per producer or importer per year in the EU.

For purposes of REACH, an "article" is an object which during production is given a special shape, surface or design, which determines its function to a greater degree than does its chemical composition. A car, a battery, and a telephone are examples of articles.

Notification is not required where the producer or importer of an article can exclude the exposure of humans and the environment to the substance during normal or reasonably foreseeable conditions of use of the article, including its disposal. In these cases, the producers and importers must only give appropriate instructions to the recipient of the article.

The EU REACH legislation requires that EU member states introduce penalties for non-compliance with its provisions. For example, in the UK, national enforcement provisions provide maximum penalties of an unlimited fine and/or up to two years' imprisonment following conviction on indictment for relevant infringements.

In order to obtain assistance for compliance with the EU REACH legislation or any other EU regulatory issues, please contact those listed below, or your regular Crowell & Moring contact.


Insights

Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.21.25

A Sign of What’s to Come? Court Dismisses FCA Retaliation Complaint Based on Alleged Discriminatory Use of Federal Funding

On November 7, 2025, in Thornton v. National Academy of Sciences, No. 25-cv-2155, 2025 WL 3123732 (D.D.C. Nov. 7, 2025), the District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed a False Claims Act (FCA) retaliation complaint on the basis that the plaintiff’s allegations that he was fired after blowing the whistle on purported illegally discriminatory use of federal funding was not sufficient to support his FCA claim. This case appears to be one of the first filed, and subsequently dismissed, following Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche’s announcement of the creation of the Civil Rights Fraud Initiative on May 19, 2025, which “strongly encourages” private individuals to file lawsuits under the FCA relating to purportedly discriminatory and illegal use of federal funding for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in violation of Executive Order 14173, Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity (Jan. 21, 2025). In this case, the court dismissed the FCA retaliation claim and rejected the argument that an organization could violate the FCA merely by “engaging in discriminatory conduct while conducting a federally funded study.” The analysis in Thornton could be a sign of how forthcoming arguments of retaliation based on reporting allegedly fraudulent DEI activity will be analyzed in the future....