EU Legislators Agree on First EU-Wide Legislation on Cybersecurity
Client Alert | 2 min read | 12.09.15
On December 7, the European Parliament and the European Council reached a political agreement paving the way for the first European Union-wide legislation on cybersecurity. The new legislation, the Directive on Network and Information Security (known as the "NIS-Directive") was originally proposed by the European Commission in 2013 and aims at ensuring common standards of network and information security in the European Union.
A final text of the political agreement has not yet been released. Statements from the relevant authorities, however, confirm that, under the new rules, businesses operating "essential services" will have to take appropriate security measures and will also be obliged to report data incidents to the applicable national authorities. The European Union Member States will be responsible for identifying the businesses concerned in the following "essential services" sectors:
- Energy: electricity, oil, gas;
- Transport: air, rail, water, road;
- Banking and financial market infrastructures: credit institutions, trading venues, central counterparties;
- Health and living: health care providers, drinking water supply and distribution; and
- Digital infrastructure: internet exchange points, domain name system service providers, top level domain name registries.
Notwithstanding serious lobbying from major internet companies, the Directive will also impose security measures and notification requirements on important digital businesses, referred to as "digital service providers" (DSPs), which include online marketplaces, cloud computing services, and search engines. Their obligations are said to be less stringent than those imposed on the essential services operators.
The relevant authorities will be empowered to impose fines if companies fail to comply.
The political agreement must still be formally approved by the European Parliament and the European Council. After publication in the European Official Journal, European Union Member States will have 21 months to implement and transpose the Directive into national law and an additional six months to identify the "operators of essential services" in accordance with the criteria set forth in the Directive.
In addition, European Union Member States will be required to adopt a national NIS strategy defining objectives and appropriate measures in relation to cybersecurity. They will also be required to designate a competent authority for the implementation and enforcement of the new rules, as well as Computer Security Incident Response Teams (CSIRTs) that will be responsible for investigating data-related incidents.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 5 min read | 12.12.25
Eleventh Circuit Hears Argument on False Claims Act Qui Tam Constitutionality
On the morning of December 12, 2025, the Eleventh Circuit heard argument in United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, LLC, et al., No. 24-13581 (11th Cir. 2025). This case concerns the constitutionality of the False Claims Act (FCA) qui tam provisions and a groundbreaking September 2024 opinion in which the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida held that the FCA’s qui tam provisions were unconstitutional under Article II. See United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Fla. Med. Assocs., LLC, 751 F. Supp. 3d 1293 (M.D. Fla. 2024). That decision, penned by District Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle, was the first success story for a legal theory that has been gaining steam ever since Justices Thomas, Barrett, and Kavanaugh indicated they would be willing to consider arguments about the constitutionality of the qui tam provisions in U.S. ex rel. Polansky v. Exec. Health Res., 599 U.S. 419 (2023). In her opinion, Judge Mizelle held (1) qui tam relators are officers of the U.S. who must be appointed under the Appointments Clause; and (2) historical practice treating qui tam and similar relators as less than “officers” for constitutional purposes was not enough to save the qui tam provisions from the fundamental Article II infirmity the court identified. That ruling was appealed and, after full briefing, including by the government and a bevy of amici, the litigants stepped up to the plate this morning for oral argument.
Client Alert | 8 min read | 12.11.25
Director Squires Revamps the Workings of the U.S. Patent Office
Client Alert | 8 min read | 12.10.25
Creativity You Can Use: CJEU Clarifies Copyright for Applied Art
Client Alert | 4 min read | 12.10.25
Federal Court Strikes Down Interior Order Suspending Wind Energy Development
