Energy - Opening Up Gas Distribution in Germany
Client Alert | 1 min read | 11.27.06
In January 2006, the German Federal Cartel Office ("FCO") released a formal prohibition decision against E.ON Ruhrgas AG, Germany’s largest gas supply company, stating that long-term gas supply contracts with its regional and local distributors violate Articles 81 and 82 of the European Treaty as well as Section 1 of the German Act Against Restraints of Competition (“ARC”). Following a landmark decision of the Higher Regional Court Düsseldorf in a preliminary ruling procedure, which confirmed the immediate effect of the FCO decision, E.ON had to adjust its contracts as of October 2006. On 27 November 2006, gas transmission companies Wingas, Gasunion and Saarferngas made binding commitments to the FCO to adapt their respective gas supply contracts accordingly. Pending acceptance the infringement proceedings initiated against these companies could be terminated according to Section 32b ACR by means of a binding commitment decision. It remains to be seen whether the remaining seven transmission companies will follow suit.
As a general rule, the FCO regards contracts as prohibitive under competition law when they cover more than 80% of the actual gas requirements and run for more than two years or cover 50% and run for more than four years. Moreover, in case of a tacit extension clause the FCO will consider the contract as concluded for an unlimited period of time. Finally, for the purpose of the competition analysis, multiple supply contracts between a gas supplier and a local or regional distributor will be regarded as one individual contract.
According to FCO president Böge, this development is a further milestone in liberalizing energy markets in Germany. If local utilities are no longer locked in to one gas supplier by long-term contracts, they can buy cheaper gas from different suppliers, which should ultimately benefit the consumer.
Although local utilities seem to be hesitant to change suppliers, due to issues like planning reliability and long established relationships (including crossover holdings), the breaking up of long-term contracts signals new opportunities for market entrants.
Insights
Client Alert | 5 min read | 08.21.26
FTC Proposes Enforcement Policy Statement on Personalized Pricing: What Businesses Need to Know
On August 19, 2026, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced a proposed Enforcement Policy Statement on personalized pricing — the practice of companies using consumers’ personal data to set individualized prices, discounts, coupons, or other incentives. The proposed statement, which is open for public comment for 30 days following publication in the Federal Register, marks a major step up in the FTC’s focus on data-driven pricing strategies and puts businesses across industries on notice that undisclosed or inadequately disclosed personalized pricing will not be tolerated. Importantly, while the proposed statement is not a binding legal requirement and does not create new legal obligations, it serves as an enforcement warning that the FTC is prepared to use its existing enforcement authority under Section 5 of the FTC Act (Section 5) and is also a potential harbinger of rulemaking. Businesses that engage in — or are considering — personalized pricing should carefully assess their disclosure practices and data collection procedures against the standards articulated in this statement.
Client Alert | 7 min read | 08.19.26
CMS’s Final Rule Bans Federal Medicaid Funding for Youth Gender-Affirming Care
Client Alert | 2 min read | 08.19.26
