End of the Road: FHWA Rescinds Longstanding Buy America Waiver for Manufactured Products
What You Need to Know
Key takeaway #1
Beginning October 1, 2025, federally funded highway projects will be required to use American-made manufactured products, in addition to existing requirements for domestic iron and steel.
Key takeaway #2
Federal agencies continue to scrutinize waivers and exceptions to existing Buy America policies, resulting in increasing coverage that contractors must proactively monitor and prepare for.
Client Alert | 2 min read | 01.17.25
On January 14, 2025, the U.S. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) published a Final Rule terminating a longstanding manufactured products waiver as part of the agency’s continued implementation of the 2021 Infrastructure Act’s Build America, Buy America (BABA) provisions. The waiver, originally established in 1983, limited application of the FHWA’s Buy America requirements to only iron and steel products, while permitting recipients of FHWA financial assistance to turn to foreign sources for more complex products. However, in accordance with the BABA’s express direction for agencies to review and reconsider waivers of general applicability such as the manufactured products waiver, the FHWA determined that its original rationale for the waiver was no longer applicable, and it proposed revised regulations to harmonize its Buy America program with the requirements of BABA (previously discussed here).
Under the Final Rule, FHWA adopts a phased approach to expanding its Buy America requirements to manufactured products, beginning on October 1, 2025. For projects obligated on or after that date, final assembly for all manufactured products incorporated into the project must take place in the United States. One year later, for projects obligated on or after October 1, 2026, FHWA will then add a domestic content test, requiring that 55% of the cost of components of any manufactured product be attributable to domestic components. After that date, the FHWA’s rules for manufactured products will be effectively identical to those prescribed by the BABA implementing guidance, with one important exception—for precast concrete products and cabinets or other enclosures of intelligent transportation systems that incorporate steel or iron components, those components will continue to be separately subjected to the FHWA’s Buy America requirements for iron and steel, requiring that all manufacturing processes for the iron and steel occur in the U.S. (iron and steel components of other manufactured products are not subject to this requirement).
The FHWA’s recission of its forty-year-old manufactured products waiver represents the latest rollback of well-established exceptions to federal Buy America policy. As the new administration continues to seek ways to promote domestic manufacturing, contractors should be prepared for additional changes in the coming months and years.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 06.12.26
DOJ Guidance Backs Away From Disparate Impact Liability
On June 9, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) issued a formal opinion concluding that the Equal Opportunity Employment Commission’s (EEOC) existing interpretations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) disparate-impact liability, including the Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures (UGESP), are unconstitutional. According to the opinion, EEOC’s prior interpretations contemplate liability based on disproportionately adverse effects alone, without regard to an employer’s likely intent, rather than treating disparate impact as an evidentiary mechanism to “smoke out” intentional discrimination. DOJ found that this approach functions as a “qualified racial-proportionality mandate” that places “a racial thumb on the scales, often requiring employers to evaluate the racial outcomes of their policies, and to make decisions based on (because of) those racial outcomes.” The opinion fulfills one mandate of Executive Order 14281, which rejected disparate-impact liability insofar as it “creates a near insurmountable presumption that unlawful discrimination exists wherever there are any differences in outcomes among different [demographic groups].”
Client Alert | 4 min read | 06.12.26
Auto Dealers: The FTC Is Back in the Driver’s Seat — Warning Letters Signal Renewed Federal Scrutiny
Client Alert | 13 min read | 06.12.26
Client Alert | 4 min read | 06.12.26


