EEOC Revokes Stance That Health Plans Discriminate If Retiree Benefits Change Upon Medicare Eligibility
Client Alert | 1 min read | 08.21.01
In an August 20, 2001 release, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") retracted its position that employee benefit plans that either end or reduce benefits when a retiree becomes eligible for Medicare violate the Age Discrimination in Employment Act ("ADEA"). Recognizing that its previous policy could have the practical effect of discouraging employers from providing health care benefits for its retirees before they become eligible for Medicare, the EEOC has established an internal task force to study the issue and obtain input from interested stakeholders (i.e. employers, insurers, advocacy groups). For now, the EEOC will no longer litigate "Medicare bridge" cases. The EEOC re-emphasized its position that "An employer must offer to current employees . . . over the age of eligibility for Medicare benefits the same health benefits, under the same conditions, that it offers to any current employee under the age of 65."
Insights
Client Alert | 2 min read | 06.15.26
Kansas Federal Court Applies “Selective Enforcement” Theory to Reject DTSA Claim
A Kansas federal court held that inconsistent enforcement of trade secret rights can defeat a claim under the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA). In Edelman Financial Engines, LLC v. Mariner Wealth Advisors LLC, No. 2:23-cv-02515-HLT (D. Kan. June 5, 2026), the court applied a selective enforcement theory, holding that when a company does not consistently pursue legal remedies against similarly situated former employees, that inconsistency can be affirmative evidence that it failed to protect its trade secrets. While the selective enforcement theory has appeared in academic hypothetical discussions, the decision appears to be one of the clearest judicial applications of a “selective enforcement” theory in a trade secret case.
Client Alert | 3 min read | 06.12.26
Client Alert | 4 min read | 06.12.26
Auto Dealers: The FTC Is Back in the Driver’s Seat — Warning Letters Signal Renewed Federal Scrutiny
Client Alert | 13 min read | 06.12.26
