1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |EEOC Joins the List of Executive Branch Agencies Launching Initiatives on Artificial Intelligence

EEOC Joins the List of Executive Branch Agencies Launching Initiatives on Artificial Intelligence

Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.17.21

On October 28, 2021, U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) Chair Charlotte Burrows announced that the EEOC is launching an initiative to ensure that artificial intelligence (AI) and other emerging tools used in hiring and other employment decisions comply with federal civil rights laws that the EEOC enforces. In her announcement, Chair Burrows explained the initiative will examine how technology is changing the way employment decisions are made, and aims to guide applicants, employees, employers, and technology vendors in ensuring that these technologies are used fairly in accordance with the law. More specifically, through the initiative, EEOC plans to: (1) establish an internal working group to coordinate the agency’s work on the initiative; (2) launch a series of listening sessions with key stakeholders about algorithmic tools and their employment ramifications; (3) gather information about the adoption, design, and impact of hiring and other employment-related technologies; (4) identify promising practices; and (5) issue technical assistance to provide guidance on algorithmic fairness and the use of AI in employment decisions. This initiative highlights the EEOC’s renewed focus on AI and builds on prior efforts undertaken by the Agency to understand the far-reaching impacts of AI in the employment context. It also highlights the challenges associated with applying the Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures (UGESP), promulgated decades before the advent of AI, to the modern workplace.

The EEOC’s initiative is consistent with a flurry of recent efforts by other Executive Branch agencies to promote trustworthiness, accountability, and fairness in these powerful AI technologies, including the following:

On October 27, 2021, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, in collaboration with Health Canada, and the UK’s Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, published Guiding Principles for the use of AI/ML in medical devices;

On October 22, 2021, the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy announced that it intended to work with partners and experts across the federal government, academia, civil society, the private sector, and communities all over the country to develop an AI bill of rights to clarify the rights and freedoms expected from data-driven AI technologies;

On August 27, 2021, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a request for information concerning, among other things, market participants’ increasing use of AI to create investment strategies and drive customers to higher-revenue products. The SEC’s action followed a request for information from a group of federal financial regulators that closed earlier this summer concerning potentially new AI standards for financial institutions;

Also in August, the Department of Transportation’s National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) announced a preliminary evaluation to look at the safety of AI to steer vehicles. NHTSA is reviewing the causes of 11 Tesla crashes that have happened since the start of 2018, in which Tesla vehicles crashed at scenes where first responders were active, often in the dark, with either Autopilot or Traffic Aware Cruise Control engaged; and

In July, the Commerce Department’s National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) issued a request for information to help develop a voluntary AI risk-management framework.

Crowell & Moring continues to monitor developments in AI.

Contacts

Insights

Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.21.25

A Sign of What’s to Come? Court Dismisses FCA Retaliation Complaint Based on Alleged Discriminatory Use of Federal Funding

On November 7, 2025, in Thornton v. National Academy of Sciences, No. 25-cv-2155, 2025 WL 3123732 (D.D.C. Nov. 7, 2025), the District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed a False Claims Act (FCA) retaliation complaint on the basis that the plaintiff’s allegations that he was fired after blowing the whistle on purported illegally discriminatory use of federal funding was not sufficient to support his FCA claim. This case appears to be one of the first filed, and subsequently dismissed, following Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche’s announcement of the creation of the Civil Rights Fraud Initiative on May 19, 2025, which “strongly encourages” private individuals to file lawsuits under the FCA relating to purportedly discriminatory and illegal use of federal funding for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in violation of Executive Order 14173, Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity (Jan. 21, 2025). In this case, the court dismissed the FCA retaliation claim and rejected the argument that an organization could violate the FCA merely by “engaging in discriminatory conduct while conducting a federally funded study.” The analysis in Thornton could be a sign of how forthcoming arguments of retaliation based on reporting allegedly fraudulent DEI activity will be analyzed in the future....