1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |EEO-1 Deadline Extended to May 31, 2019

EEO-1 Deadline Extended to May 31, 2019

Client Alert | less than 1 min read | 02.05.19

Employers will have a little more time to file their EEO-1 reports this year. Due to a delay caused by the partial government shutdown in January, the EEOC’s EEO-1 online system will not be available until “early March” according to a notice on the EEO-1 website. As a result, the EEOC is extending the deadline for employers to file their 2018 EEO-1 Reports from March 31, 2019 to May 31, 2019. The EEOC notes that further details and filing instructions for the 2018 EEO-1 Report will be forthcoming in “the coming weeks.” We will send out any further updates as they become available.

Contacts

Insights

Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.21.25

A Sign of What’s to Come? Court Dismisses FCA Retaliation Complaint Based on Alleged Discriminatory Use of Federal Funding

On November 7, 2025, in Thornton v. National Academy of Sciences, No. 25-cv-2155, 2025 WL 3123732 (D.D.C. Nov. 7, 2025), the District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed a False Claims Act (FCA) retaliation complaint on the basis that the plaintiff’s allegations that he was fired after blowing the whistle on purported illegally discriminatory use of federal funding was not sufficient to support his FCA claim. This case appears to be one of the first filed, and subsequently dismissed, following Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche’s announcement of the creation of the Civil Rights Fraud Initiative on May 19, 2025, which “strongly encourages” private individuals to file lawsuits under the FCA relating to purportedly discriminatory and illegal use of federal funding for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in violation of Executive Order 14173, Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity (Jan. 21, 2025). In this case, the court dismissed the FCA retaliation claim and rejected the argument that an organization could violate the FCA merely by “engaging in discriminatory conduct while conducting a federally funded study.” The analysis in Thornton could be a sign of how forthcoming arguments of retaliation based on reporting allegedly fraudulent DEI activity will be analyzed in the future....